ICE8000 Untrustworthy Related Behavior and Responsibility Attribution Standard

Chapter I General Provisions

1.1 In order to prevent the person responsible for the breach of trust from using the independent legal status of the legal entity, evading credit responsibility; at the same time, in order to avoid credit punishment measures involving innocent; in order to promote social integrity, reduce transaction costs, and enhance human well-being, in accordance with internationally accepted legal principles and International practice, the World Credit Organization [WCO] has developed this standard.

1.2 The main legal basis for the development, application and implementation of this standard is as follows:

(1) The principle of freedom of the Constitution. The constitutions of the vast majority of countries in the world give people the freedom to defend their legitimate rights, the freedom to maintain social justice and the freedom to express their opinions.

(2) The principle of public order and goodness of law. This legal principle gives people the right to maintain social justice. The basic principles of civil law in most countries of the world include the principles of public order and good customs.

(3) The principle of good faith in law. This legal principle gives people the obligation of good faith. Most countries in the world regard the principle of good faith as the basic law of their civil and commercial laws.

(4) The principle of freedom of contract in law, also known as the principle of free agreement. This legal principle gives people the freedom to enter into a civil contract. The basic principles of civil law in most countries of the world include the principle of freedom of contract.

1.3 The conduct of the application and implementation of this standard shall be deemed to be the tripartite or multi-party contractual act of the World Credit Organization [WCO] in Delaware, USA, as an attestation or supervisor, and The relevant disputes arising from this act are applicable to and protected by the laws of the State of Delaware and the United States, and the jurisdiction is also the International Court of Ethics or the Delaware Court of the United States and the United States Federal Court. If the parties have agreed otherwise or otherwise stated in the applicable law and/or jurisdiction, the binding does not involve the World Credit Organization [WCO].

1.4 This standard is applicable to the identification of unrelated acts and the attribution of responsibilities.

1.5 The identification of unrelated acts and the attribution of responsibilities are subject to the principles of objectivity, fairness, reasonableness and fault.

1.6 In order to prevent moral hazard, the applicant should provide a credit card or valid identification and establish a credit file.

1.7 World Credit Organization [WCO] supports people to pursue the credit responsibility of organizations responsible for untrustworthy related behaviors under the principle of observing the principle of good faith, the bottom line of morality, and the bottom line of social responsibility. The World Credit Organization [WCO] encourages organizations responsible for untrustworthy associations to actively correct untrustworthy behavior or actively remedy untrustworthy behavior.

Members of the World Credit Organization [WCO] may not engage in acts of loss of trust and loss of association.

1.8 Responsibility for unrelated acts includes legal liability and credit responsibility.

The term "association and association" as used in this standard refers to the direct or indirect control, controlled relationship, and other relationships that have important influences between organizations.

Organizations referred to in this standard include: various types of units, individuals, and regions.

The person responsible for the act of dishonesty in this standard refers to the unit, individual or region that has made the act of dishonesty and has not corrected or repaired it.

The term “legal liability” as used in this standard refers to the legal sanctions that the actor should bear for its unrelated acts, including civil liability, administrative liability, and criminal liability. This responsibility is borne by the parties and/or the effective complaints of the state department. commandment.

The credit liability referred to in this standard refers to the reputation loss, opportunity loss and psychological cost that the actor should bear for its untrustworthy related behavior. This responsibility is borne by the true dissemination of credit information and belongs to social punishment.

The senior personnel referred to in this standard include legal representatives, actual controllers, board members and secretary of the board of directors, members of the board of supervisors, secretaries, managers and deputy managers of the board of supervisors.

The actual controller referred to in this standard refers to the person who actually controls the behavior of the unit for various reasons, although the name is not the legal representative or the highest leader of the decision-making system.

The ICE8000 credit institution referred to in this standard, also known as the ICE8000 international credit institution or the World Credit Organization [WCO] member credit institution, refers to the requirements of the ICE8000 international credit standard system in terms of knowledge structure, work ability and professional ethics, and is awarded the World Credit Organization. [WCO] certification, in the credit evaluation and other credit practice work have the right and obligation to comply with the ICE8000 international credit standard system standards, to prevent their own abuse of credit evaluation and other rights or damage to the legitimate rights and interests of other types of credit companies and other credit practitioners. The ICE8000 credit institution is a member unit of the World Credit Organization [WCO], not a branch, representative office, agency or subordinate organization of the World Credit Organization [WCO]. According to the business scope of ICE8000 credit institutions, ICE8000 credit institutions can also be called ICE8000 credit reporting agencies, ICE8000 Lixin institutions, ICE8000 training institutions, and ICE8000 management consulting organizations.

1.9 The appraisal opinions published in accordance with this standard are only the principled appraisal opinions made on the premise that the evidence materials are true and correct. The substantive appraisal opinions on the related behavior of untrustworthiness and the attribution of responsibility shall be decided according to the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Dispute Arbitration Standard or the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Dispute Trial Standard.

For the identification of the principle of unrelated trust and the attribution of responsibility, the words "suspected" should be indicated.

Whether it is a principled appraisal or a substantive appraisal, it is a view based on presumed facts or real facts and is only for reference by all parties concerned. Moreover, the appraisal opinion cannot substitute for the independent thinking and independent judgment of the relevant parties. The relevant parties should read the appraisal opinions comprehensively and rationally, decide their own reference value, and independently bear the consequences of misreading due to out of context.

1.10 All parties applying this standard shall, in the process of applying this standard, abide by the principle of good faith, the moral bottom line, and the social responsibility bottom line, and exercise and assume the rights and obligations stipulated in this standard.

1.11 All parties to this standard are deemed to have fully understood and committed to comply with all the provisions of this standard. However, if any party to this standard finds any unfairness in any of the provisions of this standard, it has the right to publicly declare that it is not subject to public disclosure of the relevant circumstances and reasons and written notice to the World Credit Organization [WCO]. Terms and conditions.

Chapter 2: Standards for Untrustworthy Related Behavior

2.1 Note that if there is no opposite reason, people usually reasonably believe that there is a certain degree of interaction between business practices and business reputation between affiliated organizations. Therefore, organizations with good intentions of good faith often actively urge their affiliated organizations to avoid dishonesty or correct untrustworthy behavior in a timely manner.

It has also been noted that some people engage in untrustworthy behavior by manipulating their associated organizations that are directly or indirectly controlled to seek untrustworthy gains.

It is also noted that the proceeds of dishonesty behavior of some organizations are ultimately shared and even enjoyed by their affiliates.

Advising affiliated organizations to abandon evil and be good, and refuse to enjoy the loss of trust transmitted by affiliated organizations is the social responsibility that every earth person should take. This social responsibility can be called [not tolerant], and it belongs to the minimum standard content of social responsibility. The content of social responsibility that a person, unit or region should bear. If everyone refuses to recognize or everyone refuses to take up this social responsibility, the moral foundation of humanity will be eroded and human well-being will be lost.

To sum up, organizations that are related to the person responsible for the act of dishonesty are obliged to urge and advise the person responsible for the act of dishonesty to correct the act of dishonesty, and are obliged to refuse to enjoy the loss of trust transmitted by the affiliated organization to prove that they have not sought or shared the proceeds of the letter of loss.

2.2 An organization has a relationship with the person responsible for the act of dishonesty. After receiving a letter of advice from a third party or a related letter, if it still does not actively urge and advise the person responsible for the act of dishonesty to correct the act of dishonesty, or insist on enjoying the loss of trust transmitted by the affiliated organization. This kind of inaction or negative behavior is a tolerance for the untrustworthy behavior of the associated organization, and the tolerant behavior belongs to the act of untrustworthy association. The organization and related credit owners are responsible for the organization of untrustworthy associations.

2.3 The nature of untrustworthy association behavior is a kind of tolerance behavior, and it is a kind of [rejection of social responsibility bottom line behavior]. Although the act of untrustworthy association is not a dishonesty act, the responsible organization of the letter-of-trust act is not directly engaged in the act of dishonesty. However, based on some or all of the following reasons, the responsible organization of the letter-of-trust related act is in good faith before the credit identity of the organization responsible for its untrustworthy association is cancelled. Willingness and commercial conduct are worthy of full attention and stakeholder engagement:

(1) Responsible organizations with untrustworthy associations often have a certain indirect causal relationship to untrustworthy behaviors;

(2) The organization responsible for the act of dishonesty may be the actual beneficiary or potential beneficiary of the act of dishonesty;

(3) Responsibility organization of untrustworthy related behavior may be the behind-the-scenes planner of untrustworthy behavior;

(4) Responsible organizations with untrustworthy associations may be behind-the-scenes supporters of untrustworthy behavior;

(5) Responsibility organization of untrustworthy related behaviors may be the learner, inheritor and reserve team of the person responsible for fraudulent behavior;

(6) The responsible organization of the untrustworthy related behavior may be a fraudulent prop designed by the person responsible for the breach of trust;

(7) Responsibility-related behaviors The organization responsible for the act of dishonesty is controlled or influenced by the person responsible for the act of dishonesty. It is possible to copy or disguise the act of untrustworthy untrustworthiness, and may also engage in other acts of dishonesty.

2.4 Organizations that have direct or indirect control over the organization responsible for dishonesty. If the organization receives a letter of suspicion from a third party or a related letter, the organization responsible for the act of dishonesty does not correct the relevant act, and it is considered to be tolerant.

2.5 Organizations that have no control over the organization responsible for dishonesty, if the organization receives a third-party letter of persuasion or related letters, and promptly sign the “Not Tolerant Related Organizations [Illegal Malieve Behavior] Statement and Commitment”, it is not considered Tolerance exists, unless otherwise proved.

Chapter III Controlled Untrustworthy Correlation Behavior and Controlled Untrustworthy Correlation Behavior

Standards for behaviors associated with influential dishonesty

3.1 The unrelated behavior of one of the following factors that meets one of the following factors shall be identified as the control-type untrustworthy association behavior, and the actor and the relevant credit owner shall be identified as the responsible organization of the control-type untrustworthy association:

(1) The person responsible for the act of untrustworthy is the direct or indirect controlling shareholder of the unit responsible for the breach of trust;

(2) The person responsible for the act of breaking the trust has the right to appoint or decide the senior personnel of the responsible unit of the act of dishonesty;

(3) The responsible person of the act of untrustworthy has control over the person responsible for the act of dishonesty because of the reasons for the loan, guarantee, purchase, and sale;

(4) The person responsible for the act of untrustworthy has control over the person responsible for the act of dishonesty for other reasons.

3.2 The unrelated behavior of one of the following factors in the relationship should be identified as a controlled-type untrustworthy association, and the actor and the relevant credit owner should be identified as the responsible organization of the controlled untrustworthy association:

(1) A unit directly or indirectly controlled by the person responsible for the act of dishonesty;

(2) The unit that appoints senior personnel by the person responsible for the breach of trust;

(3) The unit that is responsible for the high-level personnel by the person responsible for the breach of trust;

(4) An organization controlled by the person responsible for the act of dishonesty for reasons of loan, guarantee, purchase or sale;

(5) An organization controlled by the person responsible for the act of dishonesty for other reasons.

3.3 The unrelated behaviors of one of the following factors that meet one of the following factors shall be identified as the impact-related untrustworthy association behavior, and the actor and the relevant credit owner shall be identified as the responsible organization of the affected untrustworthy association:

(1) There is a direct or indirect investment relationship between the person responsible for the act of untrustworthy and the person responsible for the act of dishonesty, but there is no controlling relationship;

(2) The person responsible for the act of untrustworthy association and the person responsible for the act of dishonesty are both controllers or controlled persons of the third party;

(3) The person responsible for the act of dishonesty acts as the unit of intermediate management personnel and technical backbone;

(4) There are other related relationships, which can be reasonably considered by people to have an important influence on the behavior of the person responsible for the act of dishonesty.

Chapter IV Responsibility attribution of unrelated acts

4.1 If a unit engages in acts related to dishonesty, if it violates the law, its legal responsibility shall be borne by the unit and/or relevant personnel according to law. Regardless of whether it violates the law, its credit responsibility is borne by the unit, the senior staff of the unit and the staff who have made a mistake in the act of losing the letter. A staff member who is at fault for a misconduct-related act may not deny his or her credit responsibility on the grounds of his or her duties.

4.2 If a natural person engages in a related act of dishonesty, if he violates the law, his or her legal liability shall be borne by the person and/or the relevant person according to law. Regardless of whether it violates the law or not, its credit liability is borne by the person and the person concerned with the fault of the unrelated act.

Minors under the age of 10 and other persons who are not civilly capable according to law shall not be liable for credit. If the act of defamation is carried out under the guidance of another person, the instigator shall bear the credit responsibility. Natural persons who are over ten years old but under the age of 18 or other persons who are legally restricted in their capacity for civil conduct shall bear credit responsibility for acts that are appropriate to their age and intelligence.

4.3 In the case of a related act of dishonesty in a certain area, if the specific actor can be identified, the responsibility for the breach of trust will be directly attributed to the specific actor according to the relevant provisions of this standard; if the specific actor is not determined, the legal responsibility is not borne, credit responsibility It is assumed by all personnel in the area (except for publicly opposing the act of defamation), and the order of attribution is as follows:

(1) The region is the first credit owner;

(2) The regional decision-making system (such as the Parliament) and its members (such as: members of Parliament) are the second credit owners;

(3) The regional administrative system and its senior personnel are the third credit owners;

(4) The regional judicial system and its members are the fourth credit owners;

(5) The regional administrative department and its senior personnel whose responsibilities are related to the act of untrustworthy are the fifth credit owner;

(6) The ordinary people who actively support the act of untrustworthy (referring to people other than the top five, the same below) are the sixth creditors;

(7) The ordinary people who did not publicly oppose the related act of untrustworthy are the seventh credit owner.

4.4 If a unit engages in unrelated acts, the order of credit responsibility is:

(1) The unit is the first credit owner;

(2) The highest leader of the unit decision-making system (the corresponding chairman of the board of directors, etc.), the legal representative and the actual controller are the second creditors;

(3) The top leader of the unit execution system (the general manager and other corresponding personnel) is the third credit owner;

(4) The members of the unit decision-making system (directors, directors, etc.) and the members of the supervision system (supervisors and other corresponding personnel) are the fourth credit owners;

(5) Other units (Note: Others refer to those other than the above three items) are the fifth credit person;

(6) The middle management personnel or ordinary employees who deliberately participate in the act of defamation are the sixth credit responsibility;

(7) The middle management or ordinary employees who are involved in the negligence or are forced to participate in the act of untrustworthy are the seventh credit owner.

For middle management personnel or ordinary employees who participate in the act of untrustworthy association, if there is no evidence to prove that they are the sixth credit owner, they shall be the seventh credit responsibility person.

If the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth or seventh order credit person is not found or not identified, it shall be indicated that the person responsible for the order or “to be checked” has not been found.

After the unrelated act of defamation is identified, the above-mentioned credit-responsible persons shall be identified as the responsible unit for the act of untrustworthy association, and the individual responsible for the act of untrustworthy, unless there is evidence or reason to the contrary.

4.5 If a natural person engages in a behavior related to dishonesty, he is the person responsible for credit. After the unrelated act of defamation is identified, I should be identified as an individual responsible for the act of untrustworthy association.

4.6 If a number of natural persons are engaged in a partnership involving untrustworthy, the order of credit responsibility is:

(1) The highest leader or supreme organizer of the act of untrustworthy association is the first credit owner;

(2) The highest planner of the act of untrustworthy association is the second credit owner;

(3) Those who play an important role in the leadership, organization or planning of the act of untrustworthy are the third credit owner;

(4) The relevant person who intentionally participates in the related act of dishonesty is the fourth credit owner;

(5) The person involved in negligence or being forced to participate in the act of defamation is the fifth credit owner.

The top leader, organizer, and top planner are both one person, and the first credit owner and the second credit owner are both individuals.

If the second, third, fourth and fifth credit owners are not found, they shall indicate that the person responsible for the order or “to be checked” has not been found.

After the unrelated act of untrustworthiness is identified, the above credit owners shall be identified as individuals responsible for the act of untrustworthy association, except where there is evidence or reason to the contrary.

Where more than 4.7 units jointly engage in acts related to dishonesty, after determining the order of unit credit responsibility in accordance with Article 4.6, the credit responsibility shall be vested separately according to the unit.

Where a natural person other than an employee of a unit or unit engages in a related act of dishonesty, after determining the order of credit responsibility of each party in accordance with Article 4.6, the credit responsibility shall be vested separately according to the unit and the natural person.

4.8 The person responsible for the untrustworthy association behavior\unit\region\personal\organization is a temporary vigilant credit identity. If the following matters occur, the credit identity is automatically cancelled:

(1) The person responsible for the act of dishonesty has corrected and fixed the act of dishonesty;

(2) There is evidence that the responsible organization for the act of defamation is actively taking measures to urge and advise the responsible person of the act of dishonesty to correct or repair the act of dishonesty;

(3) Responsibility-related behaviors Responsibility organizations actively take measures to supervise and persuade those responsible for the act of dishonesty to correct and repair the untrustworthy behavior, and donate all the lost income from the society to the social welfare organizations.

Chapter V Principled Appraisal Procedure

5.1 The principle identification procedures for unrelated behavior and responsibility attribution are as follows:

(1) Application. The parties concerned filed an application with the ICE8000 credit institution, promised to abide by this standard, and promised to abide by the principle of good faith, moral bottom line, and social responsibility bottom line to submit relevant evidence and materials, and at the same time make a statement of additional conscience vows.

(2) Formal review and delivery. The ICE8000 credit institution shall conduct a formal review of the relevant application materials. If the application materials are complete, the applicant shall be served with the “Notice of Association for Debt-related Behaviors and Principles of Appreciation of Responsibility” and shall be given an objection period of 7 working days. If the application materials are incomplete, return the application for identification and explain the reasons.

(3) Objection. If the accredited person expressly declares that there is no objection, there is no objection. If the accredited person has no legitimate cause, if the right of dissent has not been exercised within the time limit, it shall be deemed as no objection. If the appraiser promptly submits an overdue cause to the ICE8000 credit institution, the ICE8000 credit institution may extend the term of the dissent right according to the actual situation. When the accredited person exercises the right of dissent, he shall promise to abide by this standard in accordance with the principle of reciprocity, and promise to abide by the principle of good faith, the moral bottom line, the social responsibility bottom line to exercise the right of dissent, and the written statement of the additional conscience vows. If the accused person exercises the right of dissent, he refuses to make the above promises and statements in writing, and the objection is invalid.

(4) Issue the principle identification result. If the appraiser does not effectively exercise the right of dissent, the ICE8000 credit institution shall issue to the applicant the "Subject to the letter of conduct and the principled appraisal of the responsibility." Otherwise, the applicant shall be issued with the Notice of End of the Principle of Accreditation of Deprivation of Credit and the Qualification of the Principle of Responsibility. If the applicant or the relevant party believes that the appraiser has violated the principle of good faith and exercises the right of dissent, he may be held liable for breach of trust.

5.2 In the course of practicing, the ICE8000 credit institution may issue a principled appraisal opinion on the discovered untrustworthy related behavior and its responsibilities in the practice document, but the relevant practice documents shall be served to the parties, and the parties shall be informed of the objection period according to the relevant practice standards. And objection methods.

When people use the ICE8000 international credit standard system standard to publish credit evaluation information, they can issue a principled appraisal opinion on relevant related acts of untrustworthiness and responsibility in the relevant documents, but they should inform the parties of the objection period and the objection method according to relevant standards.

Chapter VI Liability for breach of contract and method of investigation

6.1 If the party violates the provisions of this standard, it shall bear the following liability for breach of contract:

(1) The corresponding legal liability, namely: the legal punishment prescribed by the relevant applicable law.

(2) Corresponding credit responsibility, that is, to bear credit punishments such as internal complaints, public complaints, credit warnings, internal exposure, public exposure, joint exposure, etc.

(3) The corresponding industry self-discipline responsibility, namely: announcement of criticism, fines, cancellation of credit card, prohibition of self-discipline and other disciplines.

(4) If the breach of contract causes losses (including material damage and mental damage) to others, it shall be liable for compensation. If the breach of contract constitutes a malicious dishonesty, it shall also make punitive damages to the infringed person in accordance with international practice and the principle of common law.

6.2 Method of investigation of liability for breach of contract:

(1) According to the "ICS8000 International Credit Standard System Internal Complaint Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Public Complaint Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Credit Warning Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Internal Exposure Standard" or "ICE8000" International Exposure Standards for Public Credit Standards or Joint Exposure Standards for ICE8000 International Credit Standards System for credit complaints and credit penalties;

(2) Applying for arbitration under the International Credit Dispute Arbitration Commission in accordance with the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System International Credit Dispute Arbitration Standard, without the need to submit a separate arbitration agreement;

(3) Apply to the International Moral Court for trial in accordance with the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System International Credit Dispute Trial Standard;

(4) If the defaulter has the membership of the World Credit Organization [WCO], the parties also have the right to make a complaint in accordance with the World Credit Organization [WCO] Member Supervision Standards;

(5) File a lawsuit in the US Delaware Court or the US Federal Court in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware or the United States federal law.

6.3 Violations of the provisions of this standard may and should be considered as an independent breach of contract or dishonesty. If the relevant parties appear in the process of applying this standard, such acts as fraudulent, covert, defamatory, insulting, and denying others' credit evaluation rights, the act is an independent malicious dishonesty act or an independent serious malicious dishonesty. The parties concerned have the right to merge. Investigate or separately pursue the responsibility of the independent dishonesty.

6.4 The responsibility for breach of contract in this standard shall be based on the principle of ignoring:

(1) Only the aggrieved party will take the initiative to pursue the investigation, and the defaulting party will bear the corresponding liability for breach of contract;

(2) The aggrieved party has the right to decide whether to initiate the corresponding accountability procedure for breach of contract;

(3) The aggrieved party has the right to understand the defaulting party or reach an agreement with the defaulting party.

6.5 For the employees or agents who participate in, execute, or assist the parties to breach the contract, the aggrieved party has the right to pursue its corresponding responsibility unless it proves that it is not at fault.

6.6 The World Credit Organization [WCO] shall bear economic compensation for its own faults, and the expenditure for economic compensation shall be included in the financial plan of the World Credit Organization [WCO] for the next year. If the economic compensation is large, compensation shall be made in each year.

After accepting economic compensation, the World Credit Organization [WCO] has the right to recover losses from units or individuals responsible for acts of dishonesty with gross negligence or subjective intent.

Chapter VII Supplementary Provisions

7.1 The methods of “delivery” and “notice” as mentioned in this standard include:

(1) Integrity letter delivery\notice. The sender/notifier can send a letter of integrity to the recipient/notice according to the “ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Integrity Letter Management Standard”. The time of receipt of the document as specified in the standard is the delivery/notification time.

(2) Regular letter delivery\notice. The sender/notifier may send a regular letter to the recipient/notifier, and the time of receipt of the letter by the person to be served, the person to be notified and his/her employee, adult family member or agent shall be the time of delivery/notification.

(3) Network announcement delivery\notification. If the sender/notifier cannot be served by letter, the right to use the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Document Announcement Delivery Standard shall be served by the network announcement method. If the delivery/notification is made by means of network announcement, the delivery/notification time will be the 60th day after the first publication of the delivery announcement.

(4) Other legal and reasonable delivery/notification methods.

7.2 This standard shall be implemented as of the date of promulgation.

7.3 The terminology involved in this standard, if its meaning is not agreed in this standard, its meaning is described in the "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Industry Terminology".

7.4 All kinds of materials submitted by relevant parties to the World Credit Organization [WCO] (or ICE8000 Credit Agency) in accordance with this standard shall be listed in the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System Document Copyright Management Standard.

7.5 If the relevant parties know or ought to have known that any of the terms or conditions of this standard have not been complied with, but still do not expressly file a written objection in time for this non-compliance, it is deemed to waive their right to file an objection. The waiving party shall bear the legal consequences such as losses caused by the waiver, and the World Credit Organization [WCO] and other parties shall not be responsible for this.

7.6 This standard will be revised and improved. All parties applying this standard should pay full attention to the revision of this standard and apply the latest version of this standard, but the behavior that occurred before the revision of this standard may not be subject to the new revised clause. The official website of the latest Chinese version of this standard is: https://www.ice8000.org/aenhw/gc/95.html .

7.7 The copyright of this standard belongs to the World Credit Organization [WCO], members can use it for free and unlimited use; non-members can use it free of charge for study, training, research, self-use, reprint, citation, adaptation, reference, reference under the premise of indicating or declaring the source. , reference. No unit or individual may plagiarize plagiarism or disguise plagiarism or otherwise infringe. Otherwise, we will jointly expose the infringing units, individuals and related personnel after the investigation of the infringement facts is clear (to issue a credit wanted order to the society). And reserves the right to pursue their legal responsibility. Do not infringe or infringe.

7.8 The standard version number is expressed as: ICE8000-abcd, where: the front-end ICE8000 indicates that this standard is one of the standards of the ICE8000 international credit standard system; a is the serial number of the standard in the ICE8000 system standard, if this standard is Abolished, the serial number is sometimes transferred to other standards; b is the initial writing time of this standard; c is the latest revision time of this standard; d is the number of revisions of this standard.

7.9 This standard is interpreted by the World Credit Organization [WCO].