ICE8000 Untrustworthy Behavior and Responsibility Identification Standard

Chapter I General Provisions

1.1 In order to reasonably identify the act of dishonesty, in order to reasonably determine the person responsible for the act of dishonesty, promote social integrity, reduce transaction costs, and enhance human well-being, the World Credit Organization [WCO] develops this standard in accordance with internationally accepted legal principles and international practices.

1.2 The main legal basis for the development, application and implementation of this standard is as follows:

(1) The principle of freedom of the Constitution. The constitutions of the vast majority of countries in the world give people the freedom to defend their legitimate rights, the freedom to maintain social justice and the freedom to express their opinions.

(2) The principle of public order and goodness of law. This legal principle gives people the right to maintain social justice. The basic principles of civil law in most countries of the world include the principles of public order and good customs.

(3) The principle of good faith in law. This legal principle gives people the obligation of good faith. Most countries in the world regard the principle of good faith as the basic law of their civil and commercial laws.

(4) The principle of freedom of contract in law, also known as the principle of free agreement. This legal principle gives people the freedom to enter into a civil contract. The basic principles of civil law in most countries of the world include the principle of freedom of contract.

1.3 The conduct of the application and implementation of this standard shall be deemed to be the tripartite or multi-party contractual act of the World Credit Organization [WCO] in Delaware, USA, as an attestation or supervisor, and The relevant disputes arising from this act are applicable to and protected by the laws of the State of Delaware and the United States, and the jurisdiction is also the International Court of Ethics or the Delaware Court of the United States and the United States Federal Court. If the parties have agreed otherwise or otherwise stated in the applicable law and/or jurisdiction, the binding does not involve the World Credit Organization [WCO].

1.4 This standard is applicable to the identification of untrustworthy behavior and responsibility.

1.5 The identification of untrustworthy behavior and responsibility shall follow the principles of objectivity, fairness, reasonableness, legality and fault.

1.6 In order to prevent moral hazard, the applicant should provide a credit card or valid identification and establish a credit file.

1.7 World Credit Organization [WCO] supports people to pursue the credit responsibility of those responsible for dishonesty in the principle of observing the principle of good faith, the bottom line of morality, and the bottom line of social responsibility. The World Credit Organization [WCO] encourages those responsible for acts of dishonesty to actively correct untrustworthy behavior or actively remedy the act of dishonesty.

Members of the World Credit Organization [WCO] may not engage in acts of dishonesty.

1.8 Responsibility for untrustworthy behavior includes legal liability and credit responsibility.

The senior personnel referred to in this standard include legal representatives, actual controllers, board members and secretary of the board of directors, members of the board of supervisors, secretaries, managers and deputy managers of the board of supervisors.

The actual controller referred to in this standard refers to the person who actually controls the behavior of the unit for various reasons, although the name is not the legal representative or the highest leader of the decision-making system.

The ICE8000 credit institution referred to in this standard, also known as the ICE8000 international credit institution or the World Credit Organization [WCO] member credit institution, refers to the requirements of the ICE8000 international credit standard system in terms of knowledge structure, work ability and professional ethics, and is awarded the World Credit Organization. [WCO] certification, in the credit evaluation and other credit practice work have the right and obligation to comply with the ICE8000 international credit standard system standards, to prevent their own abuse of credit evaluation and other rights or damage to the legitimate rights and interests of other types of credit companies and other credit practitioners. The ICE8000 credit institution is a member unit of the World Credit Organization [WCO], not a branch, representative office, agency or subordinate organization of the World Credit Organization [WCO]. According to the business scope of ICE8000 credit institutions, ICE8000 credit institutions can also be called ICE8000 credit reporting agencies, ICE8000 Lixin institutions, ICE8000 training institutions, and ICE8000 management consulting organizations.

The term “legal liability” as used in this standard refers to the legal sanctions that the actor should bear for his untrustworthy behavior, including civil liability, administrative liability, and criminal liability. This liability is borne by the parties and/or the effective complaints of the state department, and is a legal punishment. .

The credit liability referred to in this standard refers to the reputation loss, opportunity loss and psychological cost that the actor should bear for his untrustworthy behavior. The responsibility is borne by the true dissemination of credit information and belongs to social punishment.

1.9 The appraisal opinions issued in accordance with this standard are only the principled appraisal opinions made on the premise that the evidence materials are true and correct. The substantive appraisal opinion on whether an act is untrustworthy and the responsibility is vested according to the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Dispute Arbitration Standard or the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Dispute Trial Standard.

For the identification of the principle of dishonesty and the attribution of responsibility, the words “suspected” should be indicated.

Whether it is a principled appraisal or a substantive appraisal, it is a view based on presumed facts or real facts and is only for reference by all parties concerned. Moreover, the appraisal opinion cannot substitute for the independent thinking and independent judgment of the relevant parties. The relevant parties should read the appraisal opinions comprehensively and rationally, decide their own reference value, and independently bear the consequences of misreading due to out of context.

1.10 All parties applying this standard shall, in the process of applying this standard, abide by the principle of good faith, the moral bottom line, and the social responsibility bottom line, and exercise and assume the rights and obligations stipulated in this standard.

1.11 All parties to this standard are deemed to have fully understood and committed to comply with all the provisions of this standard. However, if any party to this standard finds any unfairness in any of the provisions of this standard, it has the right to publicly declare that it is not subject to public disclosure of the relevant circumstances and reasons and written notice to the World Credit Organization [WCO]. Terms and conditions.

Chapter 2 Standards for Untrustworthy Behavior

2.1 Untrustworthy behavior refers to the act of violating the principle of good faith, that is, under the premise of not having a legitimate cause, it damages the legitimate rights and interests of others and does not actively remedy afterwards. The following acts are untrustworthy:

(1) Without reasonable explanation, it fails to comply with laws and regulations in good faith [such as: infringement of the legitimate rights and interests of others due to defamatory or improper (exercise of statutory rights, use of statutory powers, performance of statutory obligations)] No positive remedies were taken afterwards.

(2) Without reasonable explanation, the important facts (such as concealing important facts or fictitious important facts or false statements) are not disclosed in good faith, and no active remedial measures have been taken afterwards.

(3) Without a reasonable explanation, the contract was not reached in good faith (eg, the contract was reached in an improper manner, such as by misleading), and no active remedial measures were taken afterwards.

(4) Without reasonable explanation, the contract is not in good faith [eg: infringement of the legitimate rights of others due to defamatory or improper (exercise of stipulated rights, use of agreed powers, performance of agreed obligations)], and thereafter Take active remedial measures.

(5) Without reasonable explanation, no remedial measures are taken actively for contracts that are illegal or invalid.

(6) Without reasonable explanation, no remedial measures are taken actively for their own breach of contract and illegal activities.

(7) Without reasonable explanation, denying the legitimate rights of others or refusing or delaying or obstructing the reasonable demands, reasonable requests, and reasonable demands of others, such as: denying that others have the right to credit evaluation, and then failing to take active remedial measures . (The evaluated party has the right to deny or question the objectivity and impartiality of the credit evaluation opinion, and also has the right to pursue the responsibility of not being objective and unfair credit evaluation opinions, but has no right to deny that others have the right to credit evaluation. Because the credit evaluation right belongs to freedom of speech Rights, in terms of freedom rights, are constitutional rights.).

(8) Without reasonable explanation, disappoint the reasonable trust or reasonable trust of others, and then do not actively take remedial measures.

(9) In the absence of reasonable explanation, other acts of misconduct or other violations of the universal universal value principle are made, and no remedial measures are actively taken afterwards.

2.2 The reasonable explanation and just cause referred to in this standard refer to the explanation or cause that meets one of the following conditions:

(1) The explanation or cause is understood by the victim of the relevant act;

(2) The explanation or cause is clearly convincing;

(3) The interpretation or cause conforms to the universally accepted principle of value.

2.3 The important facts referred to in this standard refer to the facts that have an important influence on the legitimate rights and interests of interested parties.

The term "contract" as used in this standard refers to the corresponding documents such as contracts, agreements, declarations, and commitments concluded in writing or in other forms.

The remedial measures referred to in this standard refer to corrective measures taken against their own misconduct, generally including active compensation for losses, positive corrections, and active seeking for the understanding of the infringed person. It indicates the conscience and goodwill of the perpetrator.

The statutory rights referred to in this standard refer to the freedoms or interests granted by law.

The statutory power referred to in this standard refers to the power [giving or seizing the rights of others] that can be used by law.

The statutory obligations referred to in this standard, also known as statutory liability and statutory duty, refer to what should be acted or prohibited as prescribed by law.

The stipulated rights referred to in this standard refer to the free acts or interests stipulated by the unilateral party or parties or parties through the contract.

The contractual power referred to in this standard refers to the power of [giving or seizing the rights of others] that can be used by one or two parties or parties through a contract.

The contractual obligations referred to in this standard, also known as statutory liability and statutory duty, refer to the stipulations or prohibitions that are stipulated by the parties or by parties or parties through the contract.

The term "good and kind" as used in this standard refers to not damaging the legitimate rights and interests of others, or: actively maintaining and enhancing the legitimate rights and interests of others. The good deeds and good deeds referred to in this standard refer to good behaviors, actions, and initiatives. The goodwill referred to in this standard refers to the willingness, intention, and consciousness of subjectively pursuing kindness and subjective desire to engage in good deeds.

The term "fair interest" as used in this standard refers to the right of a person or unit or region that conforms to [human universal value], whether or not it is supported or opposed by [a legal and/or custom of space and time].

The universal universal value principle referred to in this standard refers to the principle of universal application of human beings regardless of time, space, race, religion, belief, etc., such as: the principle of the supremacy of human basic rights, the principle of equal opportunity for human development, and the award. Good punishment of evil and the principle of merit and punishment, the principle of good faith, [the principle of fairness, justice and openness in the distribution of interests and disputes].

Chapter III Standards of General Untrustworthy Behavior, Malicious Untrustworthy Behavior, and Serious Untrustworthy Behavior

3.1 The act of dishonesty caused by the negligence of the actor (inadvertent care and overconfidence is negligence) should be identified as a general act of dishonesty.

3.2 The act of deliberation of the actor's intentional (knowing or knowing that the act of dishonesty is still or not actively remedy is intentional) shall be identified as a malicious dishonesty. Malicious untrustworthy behavior includes, but is not limited to, the following enumerated behaviors:

(1) After the actor acknowledges or defaults to the act of dishonesty, he refuses to make corrections.

(2) After receiving the letter of persuasion or related letters, the perpetrator still does not care about the credit evaluation of the credit institution, rejects the reasonable exhortation or reasonable request of the credit institution, and does not object to the reasonableness of the exhortation or request.

(3) The perpetrator’s untrustworthy behavior has been prompted, but the untrustworthy behavior or similar untrustworthy behavior is repeated more than three times.

(4) After receiving the letter of persuasion or related letters, the perpetrator still refuses to recognize the credit evaluation rights of the credit institution.

(5) The perpetrator deliberately conceals important facts, deliberately misleads others, deliberately traps others, deliberately shifts topics, and deliberately creates troubles to evade responsibility.

3.3 For acts of dishonesty that are subjectively vicious and have serious malice, they should be identified as serious acts of dishonesty. Serious untrustworthy behaviors include, but are not limited to:

(1) The perpetrator concealed the act of dishonesty, whitewashed the act of dishonesty, and concealed the act of dishonesty.

(2) The actor does not follow reasonable procedures and procedurally blocks the verification of the facts of dishonesty.

(3) The perpetrator not only evades the allegation of dishonesty or refuses to admit the act of dishonesty, but in turn fabricates the facts against the infringed person.

(4) The perpetrator insults and retaliates against the credit institution or credit practitioner or the accuser, the infringer or the witness of the act of dishonesty.

(5) The actor uses his or her dominant position, legal background, etc., to deny the credit evaluation authority of the credit institution.

Chapter IV Responsibility of Untrustworthy Behavior

4.1 If a unit engages in acts of dishonesty, its legal responsibility shall be borne by the unit and/or relevant personnel according to law; its credit responsibility shall be borne by the high-level personnel of the unit and unit and the staff members who have made faults in the act of dishonesty. A staff member who is at fault for a breach of trust shall not deny his or her credit responsibility on the grounds of his or her duties.

4.2 If a natural person engages in acts of dishonesty, his/her legal liability shall be borne by himself and/or the relevant personnel; his credit responsibility shall be borne by himself and the relevant person who is at fault for the act of dishonesty.

Minors under the age of 10 and other persons who are not civil servant in accordance with the law shall not be liable for credit. If the act of dishonesty is carried out under the supervision of another person, the instigator shall bear the credit responsibility. Natural persons who are over ten years old but under the age of 18 or other persons who are legally restricted in their capacity for civil conduct shall bear credit responsibility for acts that are appropriate to their age and intelligence.

4.3 If a specific act is determined in a certain area, if the specific actor can be identified, the responsibility for the breach of trust will be directly attributed to the specific actor according to the relevant provisions of this standard; if the specific actor cannot be determined, the legal responsibility is not borne, and the credit responsibility is The entire area (except for publicly opposing the act of dishonesty) is responsible for the following:

(1) The region is the first credit owner;

(2) The regional decision-making system (such as the Parliament) and its members (such as: members of Parliament) are the second credit owners;

(3) The regional administrative system and its senior personnel are the third credit owners;

(4) The regional judicial system and its members are the fourth credit owners;

(5) The regional administrative department and its senior personnel whose responsibilities are related to the untrustworthy act are the fifth credit owner;

(6) The ordinary people who actively support the act of dishonesty (referring to people other than the top five, the same below) are the sixth creditors;

(7) The ordinary people who did not publicly object to the act of dishonesty were the seventh credit owner.

4.4 If a unit engages in acts of dishonesty, the order of credit responsibility is:

(1) The unit is the first credit owner;

(2) The highest leader of the unit decision-making system (the corresponding chairman of the board of directors, etc.), the legal representative and the actual controller are the second creditors;

(3) The top leader of the unit execution system (the general manager and other corresponding personnel) is the third credit owner;

(4) The members of the unit decision-making system (directors, directors, etc.) and the members of the supervision system (supervisors and other corresponding personnel) are the fourth credit owners;

(5) Other units (Note: Others refer to those other than the above three items) are the fifth credit person;

(6) The middle management personnel or ordinary employees who intentionally participate in the act of dishonesty are the sixth credit owner;

(7) The middle management or ordinary employees who are involved in the negligence or are forced to participate in the act of dishonesty are the seventh credit owner.

For the middle management or ordinary employees who participate in the act of dishonesty, if there is no evidence to prove that they are the sixth credit owner, they shall be the seventh credit owner.

If the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth or seventh order credit person is not found or not identified, it shall be indicated that the person responsible for the order or “to be checked” has not been found.

If the act of dishonesty is identified as malicious dishonesty or serious dishonesty, the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth creditors shall be identified as the person responsible for malicious dishonesty or the person responsible for serious dishonesty. The seventh credit owner shall be identified as the person responsible for the general untrustworthy act, except that the credit owner has evidence or reasonable reasons to prove that he is not at fault.

If the act of dishonesty is identified as a general act of dishonesty, the above-mentioned credit owner shall be identified as the person responsible for the general dishonesty, except to the contrary evidence or reason.

4.5 If a natural person engages in acts of dishonesty, he is the person responsible for credit. If the act of dishonesty is identified as a general dishonesty, malicious dishonesty or serious dishonesty, I should be identified as the person responsible for the general dishonesty, the person responsible for the malicious dishonesty or the person responsible for the serious dishonesty.

Where more than 4.6 natural persons are engaged in untrustworthy behavior, the order of credit responsibilities is:

(1) The highest leader or supreme organizer of the act of dishonesty is the first credit owner;

(2) The highest planner of the act of dishonesty is the second credit owner;

(3) Those who play an important role in the leadership, organization or planning of the act of dishonesty are the third credit owners;

(4) The relevant person who intentionally participates in the act of dishonesty is the fourth credit owner;

(5) The person involved in negligence or being forced to participate in the act of dishonesty is the fifth credit owner.

The top leader, organizer, and top planner are both one person, and the first credit owner and the second credit owner are both individuals.

If the second, third, fourth and fifth credit owners are not found, they shall indicate that the person responsible for the order or “to be checked” has not been found.

If the act of dishonesty is identified as malicious dishonesty or serious dishonesty, the first, second, third, and fourth should be identified as the responsible person of the malicious dishonesty or the person responsible for the serious dishonesty, and the fifth credit owner should be identified. It is the person responsible for the general dishonesty, except that the credit owner has evidence or reasonable reasons to prove that he is not at fault.

If the act of dishonesty is identified as a general act of dishonesty, the above-mentioned credit owner shall be identified as the person responsible for the general dishonesty, except to the contrary evidence or reason.

Where more than 4.7 units jointly engage in acts of dishonesty, after determining the order of attribution of unit credit responsibility in accordance with Article 4.6, the credit responsibility shall be vested separately according to the unit.

Where a natural person other than an employee of a unit or unit engages in untrustworthy behavior, after determining the order of credit responsibilities of each party in accordance with Article 4.6, the credit responsibility shall be vested separately according to the unit and the natural person.

4.8 Responsible person/unit/region/person/organization, which is a temporary vigilant credit identity, the credit identity is automatically cancelled after it corrects or repairs the untrustworthy behavior.

4.9 In order to protect the public's right to know about malicious and untrustworthy behaviors and serious untrustworthy behaviors, and to protect the public from the right to be deceived, the ICE8000 credit institution and international credit practitioners should conduct information on malicious dishonesty and serious untrustworthy behavior according to ICE8000 standards. Record and disseminate.

Chapter V Principled Appraisal Procedure

5.1 The principle identification procedures for untrustworthy behavior and responsibility attribution are as follows:

(1) Application. The parties concerned filed an application with the ICE8000 credit institution, promised to abide by this standard, and promised to abide by the principle of good faith, moral bottom line, and social responsibility bottom line to submit relevant evidence and materials, and at the same time make a statement of additional conscience vows.

(2) Formal review and delivery. The ICE8000 credit institution conducts a formal review of the relevant application materials. If the application materials are complete, the applicant shall be served with the “Notice of Depreciation and Responsibility Ownership Appraisal Opinions” and the 7-day opposition period. If the application materials are incomplete, return the application for identification and explain the reasons.

(3) Objection. If the accredited person expressly declares that there is no objection, there is no objection. If the accredited person has no legitimate cause, if the right of dissent has not been exercised within the time limit, it shall be deemed as no objection. If the appraiser promptly submits an overdue cause to the ICE8000 credit institution, the ICE8000 credit institution may extend the term of the dissent right according to the actual situation. When the accredited person exercises the right of dissent, he shall promise to abide by this standard in accordance with the principle of reciprocity, and promise to abide by the principle of good faith, the moral bottom line, the social responsibility bottom line to exercise the right of dissent, and the written statement of the additional conscience vows. If the accused person exercises the right of dissent, he refuses to make the above promises and statements in writing, and the objection is invalid.

(4) Issue the principle identification result. If the appraiser does not effectively exercise the right of dissent, the ICE8000 credit institution shall issue to the applicant the "Protection Appraisal Opinion on the Act of Defence and Responsibility." Otherwise, the applicant shall be issued a Notice of End of the Principle of Accreditation of the Defence and Responsibility, and if the applicant or the relevant party believes that the appraiser has violated the principle of good faith and exercises the right of dissent, he may be held liable for breach of trust.

5.2 In the course of practicing, the ICE8000 credit institution may issue a principled appraisal opinion on the discovered acts of dishonesty and their responsibilities in the practice documents, but the relevant practice documents shall be served on the parties, and the parties shall be informed of the time limit for objection according to the relevant practice standards. Objection method.

When people use the ICE8000 international credit standard system standard to publish credit evaluation information, they can issue a principled appraisal opinion on the relevant untrustworthy behavior and responsibility in the relevant documents, but they should inform the parties of the objection period and the objection method according to relevant standards.

Chapter VI Liability for breach of contract and method of investigation

6.1 If the party violates the provisions of this standard, it shall bear the following liability for breach of contract:

(1) The corresponding legal liability, namely: the legal punishment prescribed by the relevant applicable law.

(2) Corresponding credit responsibility, that is, to bear credit punishments such as internal complaints, public complaints, credit warnings, internal exposure, public exposure, joint exposure, etc.

(3) The corresponding industry self-discipline responsibility, namely: announcement of criticism, fines, cancellation of credit card, prohibition of self-discipline and other disciplines.

(4) If the breach of contract causes losses (including material damage and mental damage) to others, it shall be liable for compensation. If the breach of contract constitutes a malicious dishonesty, it shall also make punitive damages to the infringed person in accordance with international practice and the principle of common law.

6.2 The responsibility for breach of contract in this standard shall be based on the principle of ignoring:

(1) Only the aggrieved party will take the initiative to pursue the investigation, and the defaulting party will bear the corresponding liability for breach of contract;

(2) The aggrieved party has the right to decide whether to initiate the corresponding accountability procedure for breach of contract;

(3) The aggrieved party has the right to understand the defaulting party or reach an agreement with the defaulting party.

6.3 For employees or agents who participate in, execute, or assist the parties to breach the contract, the aggrieved party has the right to pursue its corresponding responsibility unless it proves that it is not at fault.

6.4 Method of investigation of liability for breach of contract:

(1) According to the "ICS8000 International Credit Standard System Internal Complaint Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Public Complaint Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Credit Warning Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Internal Exposure Standard" or "ICE8000" International Exposure Standards for Public Credit Standards or Joint Exposure Standards for ICE8000 International Credit Standards System for credit complaints and credit penalties;

(2) Applying for arbitration under the International Credit Dispute Arbitration Commission in accordance with the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System International Credit Dispute Arbitration Standard, without the need to submit a separate arbitration agreement;

(3) Apply to the International Moral Court for trial in accordance with the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System International Credit Dispute Trial Standard;

(4) If the defaulter has the membership of the World Credit Organization [WCO], the parties also have the right to make a complaint in accordance with the World Credit Organization [WCO] Member Supervision Standards;

(5) File a lawsuit in the US Delaware Court or the US Federal Court in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware or the United States federal law.

6.5 The World Credit Organization [WCO] shall bear economic compensation for its own faults, and the expenditure for economic compensation shall be included in the financial plan of the World Credit Organization [WCO] for the next year. If the economic compensation is large, compensation shall be made in each year.

After accepting economic compensation, the World Credit Organization [WCO] has the right to recover losses from units or individuals responsible for acts of dishonesty with gross negligence or subjective intent.

Chapter VII Supplementary Provisions

7.1 The methods of “delivery” and “notice” as mentioned in this standard include:

(1) Integrity letter delivery\notice. The sender/notifier can send a letter of integrity to the recipient/notice according to the “ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Integrity Letter Management Standard”. The time of receipt of the document as specified in the standard is the delivery/notification time.

(2) Regular letter delivery\notice. The sender/notifier may send a regular letter to the recipient/notifier, and the time of receipt of the letter by the person to be served, the person to be notified and his/her employee, adult family member or agent shall be the time of delivery/notification.

(3) Network announcement delivery\notification. If the sender/notifier cannot be served by letter, the right to use the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Document Announcement Delivery Standard shall be served by the network announcement method. If the delivery/notification is made by means of network announcement, the delivery/notification time will be the 60th day after the first publication of the delivery announcement.

(4) Other legal and reasonable delivery/notification methods.

7.2 This standard shall be implemented as of the date of promulgation.

7.3 The terminology involved in this standard, if its meaning is not agreed in this standard, its meaning is described in the "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Industry Terminology".

7.4 All kinds of materials submitted by relevant parties to the World Credit Organization [WCO] (or ICE8000 Credit Agency) in accordance with this standard shall be listed in the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System Document Copyright Management Standard.

7.5 If the relevant parties know or ought to have known that any of the terms or conditions of this standard have not been complied with, but still do not expressly file a written objection in time for this non-compliance, it is deemed to waive their right to file an objection. The waiving party shall bear the legal consequences such as losses caused by the waiver, and the World Credit Organization [WCO] and other parties shall not be responsible for this.

7.6 This standard will be revised and improved. All parties applying this standard should pay full attention to the revision of this standard and apply the latest version of this standard, but the behavior that occurred before the revision of this standard may not be subject to the new revised clause. The official website of the latest Chinese version of this standard is: https://www.ice8000.org/aenhw/gc/81.html .

7.7 The copyright of this standard belongs to the World Credit Organization [WCO], members can use it for free and unlimited use; non-members can use it free of charge for study, training, research, self-use, reprint, citation, adaptation, reference, reference under the premise of indicating or declaring the source. , reference. No unit or individual may plagiarize plagiarism or disguise plagiarism or otherwise infringe. Otherwise, we will jointly expose the infringing units, individuals and related personnel after the investigation of the infringement facts is clear (to issue a credit wanted order to the society). And reserves the right to pursue their legal responsibility. Do not infringe or infringe.

7.8 The standard version number is expressed as: ICE8000-abcd, where: the front-end ICE8000 indicates that this standard is one of the standards of the ICE8000 international credit standard system; a is the serial number of the standard in the ICE8000 system standard, if this standard is Abolished, the serial number is sometimes transferred to other standards; b is the initial writing time of this standard; c is the latest revision time of this standard; d is the number of revisions of this standard.

7.9 This standard is interpreted by the World Credit Organization [WCO].