Introduction to the International Moral Court
Introduction to the International Moral Court
Important notice: The International Moral Court is an independent and purely non-governmental organization, not a state agency or government agency or semi-official organization, nor does it have any national or government background. In order to guarantee independence and neutrality, the International Moral Court does not intend to obtain the background of any country or government. At the same time, and precisely because of this, fairness and justice are the basis for the survival and development of the International Moral Court.
Dear readers, let us distinguish right from wrong, punish evil and promote good, and jointly maintain the moral foundation of mankind! We need your support!
1. Headquarters and business services of the International Moral Court
The International Moral Court was established in January 2010, with its headquarters in Washington DC, the capital of the United States, and Municipality of Grand Lake, New Brunswick, Canada. The organization provides dispute resolution services to people. The purpose of the organization is to uphold the principle of due process, apply the ICE8000 International Moral Standards System to resolve various disputes, and to safeguard and promote universal human morality.
2. Development history of the International Moral Court
(1) On January 16, 2010, the World Credit Organization (WCO) established the International Moral Court in Delaware, USA. It is an internal organization of the World Credit Organization and has no independent legal personality.
(2) On July 9, 2020, the World Credit Organization (WCO) established the International Moral Court with independent legal personality in Delaware, USA.
(3) On February 3, 2021, the World Credit Organization (WCO) established an independent legal person in Minto, New Brunswick, Canada.
(4) On January 25, 2024, the World Credit Organization (WCO) established an independent legal person in Washington, DC, the capital of the United States.
3. Features of the dispute resolution service of the International Moral Court
(1) Judgments Have No Legal Effect,They Are Opinions and Recommendations
The judgments issued by the International Moral Court are non-binding in nature. They are essentially opinions and recommendations, not legal rulings. Parties are free to comply or not comply at their own discretion.
(2) Adhering to the Principle of Due Process
a)The International Moral Court fully recognizes that the principle of due process is one of the highest achievements in contemporary human moral and legal practice. Only by adhering to due process can the fairness and reasonableness of judgments be guaranteed.
b) The use of any evidence must be preceded by notification to the relevant party, who shall have the right to raise objections before the evidence is adopted.
c) Any negative evaluative opinion must be communicated to the relevant party in advance, who shall have the right to object before it becomes effective.
(3) Extremely Broad Jurisdiction
a) Because the International Moral Court's judgments are protected expressions under the constitutional principle of freedom of speech, it is not subject to the limitations of state-imposed legal jurisdiction. Therefore, the Court can accept and adjudicate a vast range of disputes, from minor neighborhood disagreements to international conflicts, regardless of national borders, ethnicity, or legal systems. As long as the plaintiff is willing to submit the dispute, the International Moral Court has the authority to accept the case and initiate proceedings.
b) Another reason the International Moral Court has such a broad scope of jurisdiction is that, in theory, most disputes—ranging from individual conflicts to international peace-related issues—are typically caused by one or more parties intentionally or unintentionally violating universal human moral standards.As long as someone believes that another party has violated such universal moral standards, they are entitled to submit a service request to the International Moral Court for moral evaluation and dispute resolution.
(4) A Way for the World to Experience the Advantages of the American Legal System
a) Although not perfect, the American legal system is often regarded as one of the most divinely blessed and functionally ideal systems in the world. However, many people globally who wish to benefit from its advantages are not eligible to file cases in U.S. courts, as U.S. courts typically accept only cases that arise within the U.S. or have strong ties to it.
b) The International Moral Court functions as a simulated court that adopts both American law and the ICE8000 International Moral Standards as its main sources of authority. Its judgments frequently cite U.S. laws and precedents to explain what the outcome would be under U.S. legal principles.
(5) An Open, Equal, and Fair Contest Between Justice and Reason
a)The International Moral Court is a non-governmental organization and holds no legal privileges. It is completely equal to the parties involved, including plaintiffs and defendants. The Court cannot compel anyone to follow its rulings, so it must adhere strictly to the principles of procedural fairness and provide thorough reasoning to demonstrate the justice and rationality of its decisions.
b)If the judgment is fair and reasonable, compliance by the parties demonstrates their high moral character. If the judgment is unfair or irrational, the parties not only have the right to refuse compliance, but also to publicly declare their reasons for doing so. This mechanism creates an internal incentive for the Court to always pursue fairness and reason.
c)All moral judgments—along with whether the parties complied or not, and the reasons for non-compliance—are published online for public scrutiny. This allows society to judge for itself: Which argument is more reasonable--the Court’s rationale, or the party’s objection.
(6) Strong Internal Incentive to Pursue Justice and Fairness
a) As a non-governmental body, the International Moral Court does not receive official endorsement from any government. Its credibility must derive entirely from its commitment to fairness and reason.
b) If its rulings are perceived as unjust or unreasonable, parties have the right not only to refuse compliance but also to publicly explain their reasons. This accountability mechanism creates a powerful internal motivation for the Court to continuously pursue fairness, rationality, and public trust.
(7) Strong Moral Incentive Mechanism
a) If a party voluntarily complies with a fair and reasonable moral judgment, it demonstrates that the party has a high level of moral character. Conversely, if a party refuses to comply with a judgment that is clearly fair and reasonable, it signals low moral standing. In such cases, business partners and stakeholders—seeking to avoid risk to their own interests—may choose to limit or terminate cooperation with that party.
b) This kind of market-driven moral incentive system plays a positive role in encouraging better behavior.
c) In fact, many individuals or entities who once acted immorally did not do so intentionally or maliciously, but rather due to negligence or poor judgment. The International Moral Court’s dispute resolution services prompt these parties to re-examine their actions and, upon recognizing their mistake, to immediately make corrections.
Welcome to reprint, please indicate the source of the reprint World Credit Organization (WCO)