Introduction to the International Moral Court
Introduction to the International Moral Court
Important notice: The International Moral Court is an independent and purely non-governmental organization, not a state agency or government agency or semi-official organization, nor does it have any national or government background. In order to guarantee independence and neutrality, the International Moral Court does not intend to obtain the background of any country or government. At the same time, and precisely because of this, fairness and justice are the basis for the survival and development of the International Moral Court.
Dear readers, let us distinguish right from wrong, punish evil and promote good, and jointly maintain the moral foundation of mankind! We need your support!
1. Headquarters and business services of the International Moral Court
The International Moral Court was established in January 2010, with its headquarters in Washington DC, the capital of the United States, and Great Lakes, New Brunswick, Canada. The organization provides dispute resolution services to people. The purpose of the organization is to abide by and use the principle of procedural justice, resolve various disputes, and maintain the moral bottom line and universal value rules of mankind.
2. Development history of the International Moral Court
(1) On January 16, 2010, the World Credit Organization (WCO) established the International Moral Court in Delaware, USA. It is an internal organization of the World Credit Organization and has no independent legal personality.
(2) On July 9, 2020, the World Credit Organization (WCO) established the International Moral Court with independent legal personality in Delaware, USA.
(3) On February 3, 2021, the World Credit Organization (WCO) established an independent legal person in Minto, New Brunswick, Canada.
(4) On January 25, 2024, the World Credit Organization (WCO) established an independent legal person in Washington, DC, the capital of the United States.
3. Features of the dispute resolution service of the International Moral Court
(1) The scope of disputes resolved is wide. Generally speaking, disputes ranging from personal disputes to international peace are caused by misunderstandings between parties or incorrect moral standards practiced by parties. As long as someone believes that others have violated the ICE8000 international integrity standards (which are universal moral standards for mankind), they can apply for services.
(2) As a member of the World Credit Organization (WCO), the International Moral Court fully complies with the ICE8000 international integrity standards. The rationality and advancement of the ICE8000 international integrity standard provide a solid foundation for the fairness and impartiality of the International Moral Court.
(3) The ICE8000 credit system guarantees the execution of the trial results. Parties that fail to execute the trial results will be held liable in accordance with the ICE8000 standards. According to the ICE8000 standards, the Moral Court has the right to request in writing any member of the World Credit Organization to assist in the execution of the arbitration results. If the relevant member fails to fulfill its obligation to assist, it will bear the corresponding responsibility. In addition, the Moral Court has the right to impose credit warnings, public exposure, and even credit warrants on parties that refuse to execute the trial results and members that refuse to fulfill their obligation to assist.
(4) The International Moral Court shall make independent and impartial decisions based on facts, in accordance with the principles of universal human values, the ICE8000 standards, international norms, international practices, the laws of the place where the behavior occurred (or the applicable law agreed upon by the parties) and the contract provisions, in accordance with the principles of fairness and reasonableness, justice and conscience.
(5) Because the International Moral Court is registered in the United States and Canada, both of which are common law countries, and the ICE8000 system is also based on the common law system. Therefore, the International Moral Court abides by the principles and practices of the common law system, and for matters where the trial standards are not clear, it refers to the relevant practices of the common law courts.
(6) The International Moral Court adheres to and firmly upholds the principle of pursuing substantive justice with procedural justice (i.e., pursuing the purpose of justice with just means), and based on this principle, strives to safeguard the bottom line of social justice and maintain the bottom line of social morality.
Welcome to reprint, please indicate the source of the reprint World Credit Organization (WCO)