ICE8000 Social Responsibility (Daoyi Responsibility) Identification and Advising Standards

Chapter I General Provisions

1.1 In order to clarify the content standards of social responsibility, help people to better assume social responsibilities, promote social integrity, reduce transaction costs, and enhance human well-being, the World Credit Organization [WCO] has established this standard in accordance with internationally accepted legal principles and international practices.

1.2 The main legal basis for the development, application and implementation of this standard is as follows:

(1) The principle of freedom of the Constitution. The constitutions of the vast majority of countries in the world give people the freedom to defend their legitimate rights, the freedom to maintain social justice and the freedom to express their opinions.

(2) The principle of public order and goodness of law. This legal principle gives people the right to maintain social justice. The basic principles of civil law in most countries of the world include the principles of public order and good customs.

(3) The principle of good faith in law. This legal principle gives people the obligation of good faith. Most countries in the world regard the principle of good faith as the basic law of their civil and commercial laws.

(4) The principle of freedom of contract in law, also known as the principle of free agreement. This legal principle gives people the freedom to enter into a civil contract. The basic principles of civil law in most countries of the world include the principle of freedom of contract.

1.3 The conduct of the application and implementation of this standard shall be deemed to be the tripartite or multi-party contractual act of the World Credit Organization [WCO] in Delaware, USA, as an attestation or supervisor, and The relevant disputes arising from this act are applicable to and protected by the laws of the State of Delaware and the United States, and the jurisdiction is also the International Court of Ethics or the Delaware Court of the United States and the United States Federal Court. If the parties have agreed otherwise or otherwise stated in the applicable law and/or jurisdiction, the binding does not involve the World Credit Organization [WCO].

1.4 The identification of social responsibility, this standard is applicable.

1.5 The appraisal of social responsibility follows the principles of objectivity, fairness and reasonableness.

1.6 The social responsibility referred to in this standard, also known as moral responsibility and moral obligation, refers to the natural responsibility of human beings for social good, natural environment and social progress.

The content of social responsibility includes the following two levels:

(1) The first level is the bottom line of social responsibility, the minimum standard of social responsibility, and the social responsibility content that every individual, unit, and region should bear. Organizations that refuse to bear the bottom line of social responsibility or organizations that violate the bottom line of social responsibility should be punished.

(2) The second level is the content of social responsibility advocacy, which can include all actions and requirements that people promote social progress and promote universal universal value. It is voluntarily undertaken by people on their own initiative. Organizations that voluntarily assume social responsibility advocacy content should be rewarded.

1.7 In order to prevent moral hazard, the applicant should provide a credit card or valid identification and establish a credit file.

1.8 The appraisal opinions issued in accordance with this standard are only the principled appraisal opinions made on the premise that the evidence materials are true and correct. The substantive appraisal opinion on whether an act is in line with social responsibility shall be decided according to the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Dispute Arbitration Standard or the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Dispute Trial Standard.

For the appraisal opinion of the principle of [violation of the bottom line of social responsibility], the words "suspected" should be indicated; for the principled appraisal of [the social responsibility bottom line behavior], the words "principle" should be indicated.

Whether it is a principled appraisal or a substantive appraisal, it is a view based on presumed facts or real facts and is only for reference by all parties concerned. Moreover, the appraisal opinion cannot substitute for the independent thinking and independent judgment of the relevant parties. The relevant parties should read the appraisal opinions comprehensively and rationally, decide their own reference value, and independently bear the consequences of misreading due to out of context.

The appraisal opinions and persuasion letters of social responsibility are all credit information.

1.9 The World Credit Organization [WCO] supports and encourages people to actively assume social responsibilities under the principle of adhering to the principles of good faith, moral bottom line and social responsibility.

Members of the World Credit Organization [WCO] may not violate the social responsibility bottom line.

1.10 Organizations referred to in this standard include: various types of units, individuals, and regions.

The senior personnel referred to in this standard include legal representatives, actual controllers, board members and secretary of the board of directors, members of the board of supervisors, secretaries, managers and deputy managers of the board of supervisors.

The actual controller referred to in this standard refers to the person who actually controls the behavior of the unit for various reasons, although the name is not the legal representative or the highest leader of the decision-making system.

The ICE8000 credit institution referred to in this standard, also known as the ICE8000 international credit institution or the World Credit Organization [WCO] member credit institution, refers to the requirements of the ICE8000 international credit standard system in terms of knowledge structure, work ability and professional ethics, and is awarded the World Credit Organization. [WCO] certification, in the credit evaluation and other credit practice work have the right and obligation to comply with the ICE8000 international credit standard system standards, to prevent their own abuse of credit evaluation and other rights or damage to the legitimate rights and interests of other types of credit companies and other credit practitioners. The ICE8000 credit institution is a member unit of the World Credit Organization [WCO], not a branch, representative office, agency or subordinate organization of the World Credit Organization [WCO]. According to the business scope of ICE8000 credit institutions, ICE8000 credit institutions can also be called ICE8000 credit reporting agencies, ICE8000 Lixin institutions, ICE8000 training institutions, and ICE8000 management consulting organizations.

The term “legal liability” as used in this standard refers to the legal sanctions that the actor should bear for its [violation of the bottom line of social responsibility], including civil liability, administrative liability, and criminal liability. This responsibility can be borne by the parties and/or the effective complaints of the state department. , is a legal punishment.

The credit liability referred to in this standard refers to the reputation loss, opportunity loss and psychological cost that the actor should bear for [the violation of the social responsibility bottom line behavior]. This responsibility is borne by the true dissemination of credit information and belongs to social punishment.

The actual rewards referred to in this standard refer to the material rewards and development opportunities that the actor immediately receives because of his [the social responsibility bottom line behavior], including bonuses, promotion, salary increase, and increase in purchases. The reward is determined by the stakes. The person makes it according to the relevant system, contract or practice, and the value of the reward is closely related to the actual value brought by the interested party and the behavior habit of the interested person.

The credit incentives referred to in this standard refer to the spiritual rewards and potential opportunities that the actor receives for his [social responsibility bottom line behavior], including psychological pleasure, honor, pride, credibility, social respect, and potential development opportunities. The reward is realized by the true spread of credit information. The size of the reward value is closely related to the speed of credit information dissemination and social morality and public value orientation.

1.11 All parties applying this standard shall, in the process of applying this standard, abide by the principle of good faith, moral bottom line, and social responsibility bottom line, and exercise and assume the rights and obligations stipulated in this standard.

1.12 All parties to this standard are deemed to have fully understood and committed to comply with all the provisions of this standard. However, if any party to this standard finds any unfairness in any of the provisions of this standard, it has the right to publicly declare that it is not subject to public disclosure of the relevant circumstances and reasons and written notice to the World Credit Organization [WCO]. Terms and conditions.

Chapter II Standards for the Content of Social Responsibility Bottom Line

2.1 The universal universal value referred to in this standard refers to the principle of universal application of human beings regardless of time, space, race, religion, belief, etc., such as: the principle of the supremacy of human rights, the principle of equal opportunities for human development, and the award. Good punishment of evil and the principle of merit and punishment, the principle of good faith, [the principle of fairness, justice and openness in the distribution of interests and disputes].

2.2 The legitimate rights and interests referred to in this standard refer to the rights of a person or unit or region that conform to [human universal value], whether or not it is supported or opposed by [a space and time of law and / or customs] .

2.3 The right holder has the right to voluntarily waive or transfer his or her legitimate rights in the form of [expressed or default] contract. If an equity party does not voluntarily renounce its legitimate rights and interests and does not transfer its legitimate rights and interests in a contractual form, then others should not steal or seize or erode or defame the legitimate rights and interests of the right holder for any reason; otherwise, it is [damage or potential damage] The legitimate rights of others]. People can refer to [damage or potential damage to the legitimate rights of others] as [evil] .

2.4 The bottom line of human moral conscience is [do not do evil], that is: not to damage or potentially harm the legitimate rights and interests of others. The bottom line of human social responsibility should be higher than the bottom line of human moral conscience. At the same time, the bottom line of social responsibility is also a necessary condition for maintaining the bottom line of moral conscience.

2.5 The bottom line of social responsibility consists of four items. In short, it is [not tolerant], [not evil], [actively punishing evil], [respect for good deeds]. The specific criteria are as follows:

(1) [Not tolerant] means not tolerating the association to do evil until it is sincerely corrected and/or apologized. When knowing that [association organization] has committed a violation of the moral bottom line, it actively urges and advises them to correct unethical behavior before they have sincerely corrected and/or apologized, and refuses to enjoy the immoral benefits conveyed by [association organization].

(2) [No evil] means not providing humanitarian support to [the refusal to correct the evildoer, the addict, the evilr]. When knowing that a person or unit or region has committed an act that violates the moral bottom line, it will not directly or indirectly provide support, assistance, and cooperation in addition to humanitarianism until it has made a sincere correction and/or apology.

(3) [Positive punishing evils] means actively punishing [the refusal to correct the perpetrators, the addicts, and the wicked ones] within the limits of their ability, such as: criticizing education, contempt, condemnation, strengthening supervision, etc., until It is sincerely corrected and/or apologized.

(4) [Respect for good deeds] means to express respect for the charity in a timely manner after knowing that a person or unit or region has made a good deed, regardless of the motive of the perpetrator or whether the perpetrator is notorious. (Interpretation: No matter what motivation a person is, and whether or not he is a bad person, he only needs to make good deeds, and people should express respect for the good deeds. If you think that its motives are not correct or that it is good at concealing evil, you can still Be cautious in dealing with it, but you can't disrespect charity. Because expressing respect is the minimum reward for charity. If people don't respect charity, always ignore, ridicule, or question the motives of good, then charity will be reduced, social morality will be reduced. The foundation's firmness will be compromised.)

An act that conforms to the content described in the first paragraph belongs to [the social responsibility bottom line behavior].

A person or unit or region that decides and truly begins to act in accordance with the content described in paragraph 1 may be considered to be [a person or unit or region that assumes the bottom line of social responsibility].

2.6 For the act of refusing to assume the social responsibility bottom line, if it constitutes [debt-related behavior] or [disobedience], it should be identified as [untrusted behavior] or [disobedience], see "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System" Relevant Standards for the Relevant Behavior and Responsibility Attribution or the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System for the Identification of Evil Behaviors and Responsibility Assignment Standards; if it does not constitute [debt-related behavior] and [disobedience], it should be identified as [indifferent or perfunctory Social responsibility (moral responsibility) bottom line], [do not actively promote social integrity construction], [violation of social responsibility (moral responsibility) bottom line].

Chapter III Standards for Social Responsibility Advocacy Content

3.1 Social Responsibility Advocacy content refers to social responsibility content above the bottom line of social responsibility, including but not limited to the following:

(1) Actively participate in or promote public welfare actions;

(2) Actively donating to public welfare organizations;

(3) Other actions to promote social progress;

(4) Other actions to promote universal universal values.

3.2 For an act that meets one or more social responsibility advocacy content, it should be identified as [actively assume higher social responsibility behavior], and the individual, unit or region that made the act should be identified as [actively assume higher social responsibility) Individuals, units, regions].

The responsibility of the fourth chapter [violation of the bottom line of social responsibility]

4.1 If a unit engages in [violation of the bottom line of social responsibility], if it violates the law, its legal responsibility shall be borne by the unit and/or relevant personnel according to law. Regardless of whether it violates the law or not, its credit responsibility is borne by the unit, the senior staff of the unit, and the staff who are at fault for the [Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line]. A staff member who is at fault for [violation of the bottom line of social responsibility] shall not deny his/her credit liability on the grounds of his duties.

4.2 If a natural person engages in [violation of the bottom line of social responsibility], if it violates the law, its legal responsibility shall be borne by the person and/or relevant personnel according to law. Regardless of whether it violates the law or not, its credit responsibility is borne by the person himself and the person who is at fault for the [Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line].

Minors under the age of 10 and other persons who are not civilly capable according to law shall not be liable for credit. If the [Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line] is conducted under the guidance of others, the instigator shall bear credit responsibility. Natural persons who are over ten years old but under the age of 18 or other persons who are legally restricted in their capacity for civil conduct shall bear credit responsibility for acts that are appropriate to their age and intelligence.

4.3 If the [Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line] occurs in a certain area, but the specific actor cannot be identified, the credit owner will not be identified. If the specific actor can be identified, the credit responsibility is directly attributed to the specific actor.

4.4 If a unit engages in [violation of the bottom line of social responsibility], the order of credit responsibility is:

(1) The unit is the first credit owner;

(2) The highest leader of the unit decision-making system (the corresponding chairman of the board of directors, etc.), the legal representative and the actual controller are the second creditors;

(3) The top leader of the unit execution system (the general manager and other corresponding personnel) is the third credit owner;

(4) The members of the unit decision-making system (directors, directors, etc.) and the members of the supervision system (supervisors and other corresponding personnel) are the fourth credit owners;

(5) Other units (Note: Others refer to those other than the above three items) are the fifth credit person;

(6) The middle management or ordinary employees who deliberately participate in [the violation of social responsibility bottom line behavior] are the sixth credit owner;

(7) The middle-level manager or ordinary employee who is involved in the negligence of the unit or is forced to participate in [the violation of the social responsibility bottom line behavior] is the seventh credit owner.

For middle-level managers or ordinary employees who participate in [violation of the bottom line of social responsibility], if there is no evidence to prove that they are the sixth credit owner, they shall be the seventh credit owner.

If the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth or seventh order credit person is not found or not identified, it shall be indicated that the person responsible for the order or “to be checked” has not been found.

After the [Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line Behavior] is identified, the above-mentioned credit owners shall be identified as the responsible unit of [Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line] and the responsible individual [Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line Behavior], unless there is evidence or reason to the contrary.

4.5 If a natural person engages in [violation of the bottom line of social responsibility], he is the person responsible for credit. After the [Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line Behavior] is identified, I should be identified as an individual who violates the social responsibility bottom line.

4.6 If multiple natural persons are engaged in partnership [violation of the bottom line of social responsibility], the order of credit responsibility is:

(1) The highest leader or supreme organizer of [Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line] is the first credit owner;

(2) The highest planner of [Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line] is the second credit owner;

(3) Those who play an important role in the leadership, organization or planning of [violation of the bottom line of social responsibility] are the third credit owners;

(4) The relevant person who intentionally participates in [the violation of the social responsibility bottom line behavior] is the fourth credit owner;

(5) The person involved in negligence or being forced to participate in the [Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line] is the fifth credit owner.

The top leader, organizer, and top planner are both one person, and the first credit owner and the second credit owner are both individuals.

If the second, third, fourth and fifth credit owners are not found, they shall indicate that the person responsible for the order or “to be checked” has not been found.

After the [Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line Behavior] is identified, the above credit owners shall be identified as individuals who violate the social responsibility bottom line, unless there is evidence or reason to the contrary.

If more than 4.7 units jointly engage in [violation of social responsibility bottom line behavior], after determining the order of unit credit responsibility in accordance with Article 4.6, the credit responsibility shall be vested according to the unit.

If a natural person other than the employee of the unit or unit engages in [violation of the bottom line of social responsibility], after determining the order of credit responsibility of each party in accordance with Article 4.6, the credit responsibility shall be vested separately according to the unit and the natural person.

4.8 [Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line] Person\Unit\Region\Personal\Organization is a temporary vigilant credit identity. After correcting or repairing [Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line], the credit status is automatically cancelled.

Chapter 5 [Responsibility for Social Responsibility Bottom Line Behavior]

5.1 Natural persons engaged in [bearing social responsibility bottom line behavior] (for [actively assume higher social responsibility behavior] corresponding changes here, the same below), credit rewards and realistic rewards belong to natural persons. If the unit engages in [the social responsibility bottom line behavior], the credit reward belongs to the staff of the unit, the high-level personnel and the staff who have a certain causal relationship with the [the social responsibility bottom line behavior]; the attribution of the actual reward is determined by the singer, and the person is not praised. The decision is attributed to the unit.

5.2 In the case of [the social responsibility bottom line behavior] that occurs in a certain area, but the specific actor cannot be determined, the credit recipient is not identified. If a specific actor can be identified, the credit reward is directly attributed to the specific actor.

5.3 If a natural person engages in [the social responsibility bottom line behavior], he is the recipient, and the actual reward and credit reward are attributed to him. [After taking the social responsibility bottom line behavior] After being identified, I should be identified as [an individual who assumes the bottom line of social responsibility].

5.4 If a unit engages in [the social responsibility bottom line behavior], the credit order of attribution is:

(1) The unit is the first credit recipient;

(2) The highest leader of the unit decision-making system (the corresponding chairman of the board of directors, etc.), the legal representative and the actual controller are the second credit recipients;

(3) The top leader of the unit execution system (the general manager and other corresponding personnel) is the third credit recipient;

(4) Members of the unit decision-making system (directors of directors, directors, etc.) and members of the supervisory system (supervisors and other corresponding personnel) are the fourth credit recipients;

(5) Other units (Note: Others refer to those other than the above three items) are the fifth credit recipients;

(6) The unit actively participates in or promotes the middle management personnel or ordinary employees who are responsible for the bottom line behavior of social responsibility as the sixth credit recipient;

(7) The middle management personnel or ordinary employees who passively participate in the unit [the social responsibility bottom line behavior] are the seventh credit recipients.

For middle management personnel or ordinary employees who participate in [the social responsibility bottom line behavior], if there is no evidence to prove that they are the seventh credit recipient, they shall be the sixth credit recipient.

If the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth or seventh order credit recipients are not found or not identified, they shall indicate that the order winners or “to be checked” have not been found.

After the [commitment of social responsibility bottom line] is identified, the credit recipients above shall be identified as having [the unit that bears the social responsibility bottom line] and [the individual who assumes the social responsibility bottom line], unless there is evidence or reason to the contrary.

When more than 5.5 natural persons are engaged in partnerships [to assume social responsibility bottom line behavior], the singer can simultaneously use each actor as a singer, or the order of credit rewards can be determined in the following order:

(1) The top leader or supreme organizer of [the social responsibility bottom line behavior] is the first credit recipient;

(2) The highest planner of [the social responsibility bottom line behavior] is the second credit recipient;

(3) Those who play an important role in the leadership, organization or planning of [the social responsibility bottom line behavior] are the third credit recipients;

(4) Actively participate in or promote the relevant personnel [the social responsibility bottom line behavior] as the fourth credit recipient;

(5) The relevant personnel who passively participate in [the social responsibility bottom line behavior] are the fifth credit recipients.

The top leader, organizer, and top planner are both one person, and both the first winner and the second recipient are the individual.

If the second, third, fourth and fifth recipients are not found, they shall indicate that the order winner or “to be checked” has not been found.

After the [Bottom Line of Social Responsibility] is identified, the credit recipients above shall be identified as [the individual who assumes the social responsibility bottom line], unless there is evidence or reason to the contrary.

If more than 5.6 units jointly engage in [the social responsibility bottom line behavior], after determining the order of the awards of the units in accordance with Article 5.5, the credit awards shall be vested separately according to the units.

If a natural person other than the employee of the unit or unit is engaged in [the social responsibility bottom line behavior], after determining the credit order of each participant's credit reward with reference to Article 5.5, the unit and the natural person shall respectively be credited.

Chapter VI Principled Appraisal Procedure

6.1 The principle identification procedures for social responsibility are as follows:

(1) Application. The parties concerned filed an application with the ICE8000 credit institution, promised to abide by this standard, and promised to submit relevant evidence and information in accordance with the principle of good faith and social responsibility, and at the same time make a statement of the terms of the conscience vow.

(2) Formal review and delivery. The ICE8000 credit institution shall conduct a formal review of the relevant application materials. If the application materials are complete, the applicant shall be served with the “Notice of the principled appraisal opinion of the social responsibility bottom line behavior” or the “principal appraisal of the violation of social responsibility”. The Notice, giving it a 7-day objection period. If the application materials are incomplete, return the application for identification and explain the reasons.

(3) Objection. If the appraised person has no legitimate reasons and fails to exercise the right of dissent within the time limit, it shall be deemed that there is no objection or the right to dismiss the objection. If the appraiser promptly submits the overdue reason to the ICE8000 credit institution, the ICE8000 credit institution may extend the term of the dissent right according to the actual situation. When the appraiser exercises the right of dissent, it shall be in accordance with the principle of reciprocity in writing to abide by this standard, a written commitment to abide by the principle of good faith and social responsibility to exercise the right of dissent, and a written statement of the attached conscience vows. If the appraiser disagrees and refuses to make the above promises and statements in writing, the objection is invalid or less effective.

(4) Issue the principle identification result. If the appraiser does not effectively exercise the right of dissent, the ICE8000 credit institution shall issue to the applicant the "Principal Appraisal Opinions on [Bottom Line of Social Responsibility] or the "Principal Appraisal Opinions on Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line Behavior". Otherwise, the applicant shall be issued a Notice of Finalization of the Principled Appraisal Procedure. If the applicant believes that the appraiser has violated the principle of good faith and exercises the right of dissent, he may be held liable for breach of contract.

6.2 ICE8000 credit institution may, in the course of practising, publish a principled appraisal opinion on the [compulsory social responsibility bottom line behavior] or [violation of social responsibility bottom line behavior] in the practice document, but the relevant practice documents shall be served on the parties and The relevant practice standards inform the parties of the objection period and the objection method.

When people use the ICE8000 international credit standard system standard to publish credit evaluation information, they can issue relevant appraisal opinions on relevant [commitment to social responsibility bottom line] or [violation of social responsibility bottom line behavior] in relevant documents, but should be served on the parties. Relevant documents, and inform the parties of the objection period and objection method according to relevant standards.

Chapter VII Advice Procedure

7.1 The active commitment of people in a region to social responsibility is one of the important foundations of civilization in the region. The level of civilization in the region has an invaluable impact on the well-being of all personnel and future generations in the region.

7.2 People's personality is not easy to change, but people's sense of social responsibility can be established, and people's awareness of social responsibility can be improved.

7.3 The persuasion referred to in this standard refers to advising the relevant organizations to undertake the social responsibility bottom line or correcting [the violation of social responsibility bottom line behavior] through appropriate methods such as persuasion, exhortation, persuasion, and punishment.

The letter used by the ICE8000 credit institution or other organizations in the process of persuasion, regardless of the name, can be called the "persuasion letter."

7.4 For [Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line], people have the right to activate the persuasion procedure to require the perpetrator to correct. However, people do not have the right to initiate advocacy content that requires the persuasion process or forces others to assume social responsibility.

7.5 A [Breach of Social Responsibility Bottom Line], people can persuade according to internal complaints, public complaints, etc., or they can do the following procedures:

(1) Application. The parties concerned filed an application with the ICE8000 credit institution, promised to abide by this standard, and promised to submit relevant evidence and information in accordance with the principle of good faith and social responsibility, and at the same time make a statement of the terms of the conscience vow. The ICE8000 credit institution may also initiate the persuasion procedure without the application of the relevant party.

(2) The ICE8000 credit institution shall write and deliver the "Consultation Letter" or related letter, and at the same time, give it a 7-day objection period. In the "persuasion letter" or related letters, the warning clause can be added according to the actual situation.

(3) Objection and correction. If the relevant personnel raises a reasonable objection or corrects [the violation of the social responsibility bottom line behavior] or gives up the opportunity to make [the violation of the social responsibility bottom line behavior], the ICE8000 credit institution shall delete the "persuasion letter". Otherwise, the "Consultation Letter" should be retained for reference by a specific unit or individual. If necessary, the "Consultation Letter" can also be disclosed. In the case of "advising the good letter", if there is a warning clause, the punishment procedure shall be initiated in time according to the terms of the warning.

Chapter VIII Liability for breach of contract and method of investigation

8.1 If the party violates the provisions of this standard, it shall bear the following liability for breach of contract:

(1) The corresponding legal liability, namely: the legal punishment prescribed by the relevant applicable law.

(2) Corresponding credit responsibility, that is, to bear credit punishments such as internal complaints, public complaints, credit warnings, internal exposure, public exposure, joint exposure, etc.

(3) The corresponding industry self-discipline responsibility, namely: announcement of criticism, fines, cancellation of credit card, prohibition of self-discipline and other disciplines.

(4) If the breach of contract causes losses (including material damage and mental damage) to others, it shall be liable for compensation. If the breach of contract constitutes a malicious dishonesty, it shall also make punitive damages to the infringed person in accordance with international practice and the principle of common law.

8.2 Method of investigation of liability for breach of contract:

(1) According to the "ICS8000 International Credit Standard System Internal Complaint Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Public Complaint Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Credit Warning Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Internal Exposure Standard" or "ICE8000" International Exposure Standards for Public Credit Standards or Joint Exposure Standards for ICE8000 International Credit Standards System for credit complaints and credit penalties;

(2) Applying for arbitration under the International Credit Dispute Arbitration Commission in accordance with the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System International Credit Dispute Arbitration Standard, without the need to submit a separate arbitration agreement;

(3) Apply to the International Moral Court for trial in accordance with the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System International Credit Dispute Trial Standard;

(4) If the defaulter has the membership of the World Credit Organization [WCO], the parties also have the right to make a complaint in accordance with the World Credit Organization [WCO] Member Supervision Standards;

(5) File a lawsuit in the US Delaware Court or the US Federal Court in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware or the United States federal law.

8.3 Violations of the provisions of this standard may and should be considered as an independent breach of contract or untrustworthy behavior. If the relevant parties appear in the process of applying this standard, such acts as fraudulent, covert, defamatory, insulting, and denying others' credit evaluation rights, the act is an independent malicious dishonesty act or an independent serious malicious dishonesty. The parties concerned have the right to merge. Investigate or separately pursue the responsibility of the independent dishonesty.

8.4 The responsibility for breach of contract in this standard shall be based on the principle of ignoring:

(1) Only the aggrieved party will take the initiative to pursue the investigation, and the defaulting party will bear the corresponding liability for breach of contract;

(2) The aggrieved party has the right to decide whether to initiate the corresponding accountability procedure for breach of contract;

(3) The aggrieved party has the right to understand the defaulting party or reach an agreement with the defaulting party.

8.5 For the employee or agent who participates in, performs, or assists the party to breach the contract, the aggrieved party has the right to pursue its corresponding responsibility unless it proves that it is not at fault.

8.6 The World Credit Organization [WCO] shall bear economic compensation for its own faults, and the expenditure for economic compensation shall be included in the financial plan of the World Credit Organization [WCO] for the next year. If the economic compensation is large, compensation shall be made in each year.

After accepting economic compensation, the World Credit Organization [WCO] has the right to recover losses from units or individuals responsible for acts of dishonesty with gross negligence or subjective intent.

Chapter IX Supplementary Provisions

9.1 The methods of “delivery” and “notification” as mentioned in this standard include:

(1) Integrity letter delivery\notice. The sender/notifier can send a letter of integrity to the recipient/notice according to the “ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Integrity Letter Management Standard”. The time of receipt of the document as specified in the standard is the delivery/notification time.

(2) Regular letter delivery\notice. The sender/notifier may send a regular letter to the recipient/notifier, and the time of receipt of the letter by the person to be served, the person to be notified and his/her employee, adult family member or agent shall be the time of delivery/notification.

(3) Network announcement delivery\notification. If the sender/notifier cannot be served by letter, the right to use the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Document Announcement Delivery Standard shall be served by the network announcement method. If the delivery/notification is made by means of network announcement, the delivery/notification time will be the 60th day after the first publication of the delivery announcement.

(4) Other legal and reasonable delivery/notification methods.

9.2 This standard shall be implemented as of the date of promulgation.

9.3 The terminology involved in this standard, if its meaning is not agreed in this standard, its meaning is described in the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Industry Terminology.

9.4 All relevant parties submit various types of materials submitted to the World Credit Organization [WCO] (or ICE8000 Credit Agency) in accordance with this standard. For the copyright agreement, see the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Document Copyright Management Standard.

9.5 If the relevant parties know or ought to have known that any of the terms or conditions of this standard have not been complied with, but still do not expressly file a written objection in time for this non-compliance, it is deemed to waive their right to file an objection. The waiving party shall bear the legal consequences such as losses caused by the waiver, and the World Credit Organization [WCO] and other parties shall not be responsible for this.

9.6 This standard will be revised and improved. All parties applying this standard should pay full attention to the revision of this standard and apply the latest version of this standard, but the behavior that occurred before the revision of this standard may not be subject to the new revised clause. The official website of the latest Chinese version of this standard is: https://www.ice8000.org/aenhw/gc/157.html .

9.7 The copyright of this standard belongs to the World Credit Organization [WCO], members can use it for free and unlimited use; non-members can use it for free, study, training, research, self-use, reprint, quote, adaptation, reference, reference if they indicate or declare the source. , reference. No unit or individual may plagiarize plagiarism or disguise plagiarism or otherwise infringe. Otherwise, we will jointly expose the infringing units, individuals and related personnel after the investigation of the infringement facts is clear (to issue a credit wanted order to the society). And reserves the right to pursue their legal responsibility. Do not infringe or infringe.

9.8 The standard version number is expressed as: ICE8000-abcd, where: the front-end ICE8000 indicates that this standard belongs to one of the standards of the ICE8000 international credit standard system; a is the serial number of the standard in the ICE8000 system standard, if this standard is Abolished, the serial number is sometimes transferred to other standards; b is the initial writing time of this standard; c is the latest revision time of this standard; d is the number of revisions of this standard.

9.9 This standard is interpreted by the World Credit Organization [WCO].