ICE8000 Moral Conscience Identification and Persuasion Standard

Chapter I General Provisions

1.1 In order to clarify and maintain the bottom line of human moral conscience, promote social integrity, reduce transaction costs, and enhance human well-being, the World Credit Organization [WCO] has established this standard in accordance with internationally accepted legal principles and international practices.

1.2 The main legal basis for the development, application and implementation of this standard is as follows:

(1) The principle of freedom of the Constitution. The constitutions of the vast majority of countries in the world give people the freedom to defend their legitimate rights, the freedom to maintain social justice and the freedom to express their opinions.

(2) The principle of public order and goodness of law. This legal principle gives people the right to maintain social justice. The basic principles of civil law in most countries of the world include the principles of public order and good customs.

(3) The principle of good faith in law. This legal principle gives people the obligation of good faith. Most countries in the world regard the principle of good faith as the basic law of their civil and commercial laws.

(4) The principle of freedom of contract in law, also known as the principle of free agreement. This legal principle gives people the freedom to enter into a civil contract. The basic principles of civil law in most countries of the world include the principle of freedom of contract.

1.3 The conduct of the application and implementation of this standard shall be deemed to be the tripartite or multi-party contractual act of the World Credit Organization [WCO] in Delaware, USA, as an attestation or supervisor, and The relevant disputes arising from this act are applicable to and protected by the laws of the State of Delaware and the United States, and the jurisdiction is also the International Court of Ethics or the Delaware Court of the United States and the United States Federal Court. If the parties have agreed otherwise or otherwise stated in the applicable law and/or jurisdiction, the binding does not involve the World Credit Organization [WCO].

1.4 Identification of moral conscience, this standard applies.

1.5 The identification of moral conscience follows the principles of objectivity, fairness and reasonableness.

1.6 The moral conscience referred to in this standard refers to the good behavioral norms formed by human beings in activities. It exists in society and in the hearts of people. The content of moral conscience includes the following two levels:

(1) The first level is the bottom line of moral conscience, the minimum standard of moral conscience, and the code of conduct that every individual, unit, and region should abide by. Organizations that refuse to comply with the bottom line of moral conscience or organizations that violate the bottom line of moral conscience should be punished.

(2) The second level is the high moral conscience, which can include all the pursuits of human universal values ​​such as truth, goodness and beauty, which are above the bottom line of moral conscience. There are various differences in people's understanding and practice of the high moral conscience. Unless there is a contract, one cannot force others to pursue and practice the high moral conscience. For those who voluntarily pursue and practice the high moral conscience, they should be rewarded.

1.7 In order to prevent moral hazard, the applicant should provide a credit card or valid identification and establish a credit file.

1.8 The appraisal opinions issued in accordance with this standard are only the principled appraisal opinions made on the premise that the evidence materials are true and correct. The substantive appraisal opinion on whether an act is in line with moral conscience is judged according to the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Dispute Arbitration Standard or the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Dispute Trial Standard.

For the appraisal opinion of the principle of behavior that violates the bottom line of moral conscience, the words “suspected” should be indicated; for the principled appraisal of behaviors that conform to moral conscience, the words “principle” should be indicated.

Whether it is a principled appraisal or a substantive appraisal, it is a view based on presumed facts or real facts and is only for reference by all parties concerned. Moreover, the appraisal opinion cannot substitute for the independent thinking and independent judgment of the relevant parties. The relevant parties should read the appraisal opinions comprehensively and rationally, decide their own reference value, and independently bear the consequences of misreading due to out of context.

The appraisal opinions and persuasion letters of moral conscience are all credit information.

1.9 The World Credit Organization [WCO] supports and encourages people to abide by the principles of the principle of good faith and the bottom line of moral conscience, to punish violations of the moral conscience bottom line, to reward ethical behavior, and to safeguard the moral conscience of all mankind.

Members of the World Credit Organization [WCO] must not violate the behavior of the moral conscience bottom line.

1.10 Organizations referred to in this standard include: various types of units, individuals, and regions.

The senior personnel referred to in this standard include legal representatives, actual controllers, board members and secretary of the board of directors, members of the board of supervisors, secretaries, managers and deputy managers of the board of supervisors.

The actual controller referred to in this standard refers to the person who actually controls the behavior of the unit for various reasons, although the name is not the legal representative or the highest leader of the decision-making system.

The ICE8000 credit institution referred to in this standard, also known as the ICE8000 international credit institution or the World Credit Organization [WCO] member credit institution, refers to the requirements of the ICE8000 international credit standard system in terms of knowledge structure, work ability and professional ethics, and is awarded the World Credit Organization. [WCO] certification, in the credit evaluation and other credit practice work have the right and obligation to comply with the ICE8000 international credit standard system standards, to prevent their own abuse of credit evaluation and other rights or damage to the legitimate rights and interests of other types of credit companies and other credit practitioners. The ICE8000 credit institution is a member unit of the World Credit Organization [WCO], not a branch, representative office, agency or subordinate organization of the World Credit Organization [WCO]. According to the business scope of ICE8000 credit institutions, ICE8000 credit institutions can also be called ICE8000 credit reporting agencies, ICE8000 Lixin institutions, ICE8000 training institutions, and ICE8000 management consulting organizations.

The term “legal liability” as used in this standard refers to the legal sanctions that the actor should bear for his unethical behavior, including civil liability, administrative liability, and criminal liability. This liability is borne by the parties and/or the effective complaints of the state department, and is a legal punishment. commandment.

The credit liability referred to in this standard refers to the reputation loss, opportunity loss and psychological cost that the actor should bear for his unethical behavior. This responsibility is borne by the true dissemination of credit information and belongs to social punishment.

The actual rewards referred to in this standard refer to the material rewards and development opportunities that the actor immediately receives because of his [in line with the moral conscience bottom line behavior], which mainly includes bonuses, promotion, salary increase, increase of purchase amount, etc. According to the relevant system, contract or custom, the value of the reward is closely related to the actual value brought by the interested person and the behavior habit of the interested person.

The credit incentives referred to in this standard refer to the spiritual rewards and potential opportunities that the actor receives for his [ethical bottom line behavior], including psychological pleasure, honor, pride, credibility, social respect, and potential development opportunities. The reward is realized by the true spread of credit information. The size of the reward value is closely related to the speed of credit information dissemination and social morality and public value orientation.

1.11 All parties applying this standard shall, in the process of applying this standard, abide by the principle of good faith, moral bottom line, and social responsibility bottom line, and exercise and assume the rights and obligations stipulated in this standard.

1.12 All parties to this standard are deemed to have fully understood and committed to comply with all the provisions of this standard. However, if any party to this standard finds any unfairness in any of the provisions of this standard, it has the right to publicly declare that it is not subject to public disclosure of the relevant circumstances and reasons and written notice to the World Credit Organization [WCO]. Terms and conditions.

Chapter 2: Standards for the Content of Moral Conscience

2.1 Human moral conscience is the subjective pursuit and maintenance of [human universal value]. In different time and space, in addition to correct moral and non-judgment, [moral] is sometimes mistaken for [immoral], and [immoral] is sometimes mistaken for [ethical]. People should not use [the success or failure of the perpetrator] as the standard of morality and righteousness, nor should [the law or state power or customs or number of people] be the standard of morality and righteousness, but should [whether the perpetrator violates universal universal value] As a standard of morality and righteousness.

2.2 No matter how perfect the law and system, it is just infinitely close to perfection, but never achieve perfection. Objectively, there will always be flaws in laws and systems. [Human moral conscience] will make up for the shackles of law and system and enhance the well-being of mankind.

2.3 The universal universal value referred to in this standard refers to the principle of universal application of human beings regardless of time, space, race, religion, belief, etc., such as: the principle of the supremacy of human rights, the principle of equal opportunities for human development, and the award. Good punishment of evil and the principle of merit and punishment, the principle of good faith, [the principle of fairness, justice and openness in the distribution of interests and disputes].

2.4 The legitimate rights and interests referred to in this standard refer to the rights of a person or unit or region that conform to [human universal value], whether or not it is supported or opposed by [a space and time of law and / or customs] .

2.5 The right holder has the right to voluntarily waive or transfer his or her legitimate rights in the form of [expressed or default] contract. If an equity party does not voluntarily renounce its legitimate rights and interests and does not transfer its legitimate rights and interests in a contractual form, then others should not steal or seize or erode or defame the legitimate rights and interests of the right holder for any reason; otherwise, it is [damage or potential damage] The legitimate rights of others]. People can refer to [damage or potential damage to the legitimate rights of others] as [evil] .

2.6 The bottom line of human moral conscience, in short, is [not evil], the specific criteria are as follows:

(1) Subjectively not intentionally [damaging or potentially damaging the legitimate rights and interests of others], if it is aware that it has objectively [damaged or potentially harmed the legitimate rights and interests of others], it is sincerely corrected and/or apologized. (In short: don't intentionally hurt others, if you hurt others because of negligence, then sincerely correct and/or apologize.)

(2) Subjectively not seeking or maintaining [another or part of a person or one's own rights] at the expense of damage or potential damage [the legitimate rights of another person or part of the person]. (Note: The mayor has assigned the police to risk his life to stop a violent crime, not to damage the legitimate rights and interests of the police [the legitimate right here refers to: the right to life and health], because a person who chooses the police profession is equivalent to using the contract. The form gives way to the legitimate rights and interests of the self part [the legitimate rights here refers to the right to life and health when performing duties]. Another example: the bank president orders the staff to wear work clothes during work, which is not a legitimate right to damage the employees [here The legitimate rights and interests refer to: dressing freedom of decision], because one person chooses the bank employee profession, it is equivalent to using the contract form to transfer part of the legitimate rights and interests of the self [the legitimate rights here refers to: the freedom of dressing during the work period ].)

(3) In the event of a conflict [eg war, civil dispute, etc.], the parties to the conflict subjectively avoid damage or potential damage [innocent and third party] and give objectively caused damage or potential damage Compensation. (Note: Various conflicts are sometimes inevitable objectively, but regardless of whether the conflict itself violates the moral bottom line, the parties to the conflict should not harm or potentially harm the legitimate rights and interests of [innocent and third parties].)

An act that conforms to the content described in the first paragraph belongs to [the ethical conscience bottom line behavior].

A person or unit or region that decides and truly begins to act in accordance with the content described in paragraph 1 may be considered an ethical person or unit or region.

2.7 Acts that violate the bottom line of moral conscience are unethical, including but not limited to the following:

(1) The perpetrator has subjectively [the purpose of harming or potentially damaging the legitimate rights and interests of others] and has acted accordingly, whether or not it objectively benefits.

(2) The perpetrator subjectively seeks or maintains [another or part of the person or his or her own rights] at the expense of damage or potential damage [the legitimate rights of another person or part of the person], whether or not it achieves its purpose.

(3) The perpetrator has subjectively, although not malicious, or even has a purpose of good faith, but objectively damages or potentially harms the legitimate rights and interests of others due to improper methods, and refuses to correct and/or after knowing or ought to be aware of it. Or sincerely apologize.

(4) The perpetrator intentionally uses [legal defects, system defects, bad customs and habits] to damage or potentially harm the legitimate rights and interests of others.

2.8 Thoughts or motives that violate the moral bottom line are unethical thoughts or motives.

A person or unit with unethical thoughts or motivations before it is corrected. Although it is not responsible for unrelated behavior, all parties need to be cautious with it.

2.9 In any of the following cases, it is not within the scope of moral evaluation and appraisal:

(1) the behavior, thoughts or motives in the field of personal private life;

(2) There is no act, thought or motive of the injured person or the potentially injured person.

Chapter III Standards for Moral and High Behavior

3.1 Without prejudice to the moral bottom line, people can have higher moral pursuits and actions on occasional, short-term or long-term. If such pursuits and actions conform to the universal universal value principle, they should be identified as morally noble behaviors. Morally noble behavior includes, but is not limited to:

(1) Subjectively, it does not violate the moral bottom line, and strives to pursue the effect of benefiting under the premise of benefiting people.

(2) Subjectively do not violate the moral bottom line, and strive to pursue the effect of benefiting people, do not specifically consider whether their rights and interests are damaged.

(3) Subjectively do not violate the moral bottom line, and strive to pursue and practice universal universal values, regardless of whether their rights and interests are damaged.

3.2 Individuals, units, and regions that have made morally noble behaviors should be identified as [high-ranking individuals, units, and regions].

Chapter IV Responsibility of Unethical Behavior

4.1 If a unit engages in unethical behavior, if it violates the law, its legal responsibility shall be borne by the unit and/or relevant personnel according to law. Whether or not it violates the law, its credit responsibility is borne by the unit, the senior staff of the unit and the staff who are at fault for the unethical behavior. A staff member who is at fault for unethical behavior may not deny his or her credit responsibility on the grounds of his or her duties.

4.2 If a natural person engages in unethical behavior, if he violates the law, his or her legal liability shall be borne by the person and/or relevant personnel according to law. Whether or not it violates the law, its credit responsibility is borne by itself and the person responsible for the unethical conduct.

Minors under the age of 10 and other persons who are not civilly capable according to law shall not be liable for credit. If unethical behavior is carried out under the supervision of others, the instigator shall bear credit responsibility. Natural persons who are over ten years old but under the age of 18 or other persons who are legally restricted in their capacity for civil conduct shall bear credit responsibility for acts that are appropriate to their age and intelligence.

4.3 If the unethical behavior occurs in a certain area, but the specific actor cannot be determined, the credit owner will not be identified. If the specific actor can be identified, the credit responsibility is directly attributed to the specific actor.

4.4 If a unit engages in unethical behavior, the order of credit responsibility is:

(1) The unit is the first credit owner;

(2) The highest leader of the unit decision-making system (the corresponding chairman of the board of directors, etc.), the legal representative and the actual controller are the second creditors;

(3) The top leader of the unit execution system (the general manager and other corresponding personnel) is the third credit owner;

(4) The members of the unit decision-making system (directors, directors, etc.) and the members of the supervision system (supervisors and other corresponding personnel) are the fourth credit owners;

(5) Other units (Note: Others refer to those other than the above three items) are the fifth credit person;

(6) The middle management personnel or ordinary employees who deliberately participate in unethical behavior are the sixth credit responsibility person;

(7) Middle management personnel or ordinary employees who are negligent or involved in unethical behavior are the seventh credit owner.

For middle managers or ordinary employees who participate in unethical behavior, if there is no evidence to prove that they are the sixth credit owner, they shall be the seventh credit owner.

If the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth or seventh order credit person is not found or not identified, it shall be indicated that the person responsible for the order or “to be checked” has not been found.

After the unethical behavior is identified, the above credit owners shall be identified as the unscrupulous responsible unit and the unethical act responsible individual, unless there is evidence or reason to the contrary.

4.5 If a natural person engages in unethical behavior, he is the person responsible for credit. After the unethical behavior is identified, I should be identified as an unethical person responsible.

Where more than 4.6 natural persons are engaged in unethical behavior, the order of credit responsibility is:

(1) The highest leader or supreme organizer of unethical behavior is the first credit owner;

(2) The highest planner of unethical behavior is the second credit owner;

(3) Those who play an important role in the leadership, organization or planning of unethical behavior are the third credit owners;

(4) The relevant person who intentionally participates in unethical behavior is the fourth credit owner;

(5) The person responsible for negligence or being forced to participate in unethical behavior is the fifth credit owner.

The top leader, organizer, and top planner are both one person, and the first credit owner and the second credit owner are both individuals.

If the second, third, fourth and fifth credit owners are not found, they shall indicate that the person responsible for the order or “to be checked” has not been found.

After the unethical behavior is identified, the above credit owners shall be identified as individuals responsible for unethical behavior, unless there is evidence or reason to the contrary.

Where more than 4.7 units jointly engage in unethical behavior, after determining the order of unit credit responsibility in accordance with Article 4.6, the credit responsibility shall be vested separately according to the unit.

Where a natural person other than an employee of a unit or unit engages in unethical behavior together, after determining the order of credit responsibility of each party in accordance with Article 4.6, the credit responsibility shall be vested separately according to the unit and the natural person.

4.8 Unethical Conduct Responsible Person\Unit\Region\Personal\Organization is a temporary vigilant credit identity. After correcting or repairing unethical behavior, the credit status is automatically cancelled.

The fifth chapter [the ethical conscience bottom line behavior] reward attribution

5.1 Natural persons engaged in [the morality of the bottom line behavior] (for the moral high-level behavior here to make corresponding changes, the same below), credit rewards and realistic rewards belong to natural persons. If the unit engages in [the behavior of ethical conscience bottom line], the credit reward belongs to the staff of the unit, the high-level personnel and the staff who have a certain causal relationship with the [ethical line of ethical conscience]; the attribution of the actual reward is determined by the singer, and the person is not praised. The decision is attributed to the unit.

5.2 In the case of [the ethical conscience bottom line behavior] that occurs in a certain area, but the specific actor cannot be determined, the credit recipient is not identified. If a specific actor can be identified, the credit reward is directly attributed to the specific actor.

5.3 If a natural person is engaged in [the moral conscience bottom line behavior], I am the recipient, and the actual reward and credit reward are attributed to me. After being identified as an ethical conscience bottom line, I should be identified as a moral individual.

5.4 If a unit engages in [the behavior of ethical conscience bottom line], the order of credit rewards is:

(1) The unit is the first credit recipient;

(2) The highest leader of the unit decision-making system (the corresponding chairman of the board of directors, etc.), the legal representative and the actual controller are the second credit recipients;

(3) The top leader of the unit execution system (the general manager and other corresponding personnel) is the third credit recipient;

(4) Members of the unit decision-making system (directors of directors, directors, etc.) and members of the supervisory system (supervisors and other corresponding personnel) are the fourth credit recipients;

(5) Other units (Note: Others refer to those other than the above three items) are the fifth credit recipients;

(6) The unit actively participates in or promotes the middle management or ordinary employees who are [in line with the moral conscience bottom line behavior] as the sixth credit recipient;

(7) The middle management personnel or ordinary employees who are passively involved in the unit [in line with the moral conscience bottom line behavior] are the seventh credit recipients.

For mid-level managers or ordinary employees who participate in [the moral conscience bottom line behavior], if there is no evidence to prove that they are the seventh credit recipient, they shall be the sixth credit recipient.

If the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth or seventh order credit recipients are not found or not identified, they shall indicate that the order winners or “to be checked” have not been found.

After the [the moral conscience bottom line behavior] is identified, the above credit recipients shall be identified as having moral units and ethical individuals, unless there is evidence or reason to the contrary.

When more than 5.5 natural persons are engaged in partnerships [in line with the moral conscience bottom line behavior], the singer can simultaneously use each actor as a singer, or the order of credit rewards can be determined in the following order:

(1) The top leader or supreme organizer of [the moral conscience bottom line behavior] is the first credit recipient;

(2) The highest planner of [the moral conscience bottom line behavior] is the second credit recipient;

(3) Those who play an important role in the leadership, organization or planning of [the moral conscience bottom line behavior] are the third credit recipients;

(4) Actively participate in or promote the relevant personnel [in line with the moral conscience bottom line behavior] as the fourth credit recipient;

(5) The relevant personnel who passively participate in [the moral conscience bottom line behavior] are the fifth credit recipients.

The top leader, organizer, and top planner are both one person, and both the first winner and the second recipient are the individual.

If the second, third, fourth and fifth recipients are not found, they shall indicate that the order winner or “to be checked” has not been found.

After the [informed moral conscience bottom line behavior] is identified, the above credit recipients shall be identified as ethical individuals, unless there is evidence or reason to the contrary.

If more than 5.6 units jointly engage in [the behavior of ethical conscience bottom line], after determining the order of award of the unit in accordance with Article 5.5, the credit award will be vested according to the unit.

If a natural person other than the employee of the unit or unit is engaged in [the behavior of the moral conscience bottom line], after determining the order of credit awards of each participant in accordance with Article 5.5, the unit and the natural person shall respectively be credited.

Chapter VI Principled Appraisal Procedure

6.1 The principle identification procedure for moral conscience is as follows:

(1) Application. The parties concerned filed an application with the ICE8000 credit institution, promised to abide by this standard, and promised to abide by the principle of good faith, moral bottom line, and social responsibility bottom line to submit relevant evidence and materials, and at the same time make a statement of additional conscience vows.

(2) Formal review and delivery. The ICE8000 credit institution shall conduct a formal review of the relevant application materials. If the application materials are complete, the applicant shall be served with the “Notice of the Principle of Appraisal of the Qualified Underline Action” or the “Notice of the Appraisal of the Unethical Conduct Principles”. Give him a 7-day objection period. If the application materials are incomplete, return the application for identification and explain the reasons.

(3) Objection. If the appraised person has no legitimate reasons and fails to exercise the right of dissent within the time limit, it shall be deemed that there is no objection or the right to dismiss the objection. If the appraiser promptly submits the overdue reason to the ICE8000 credit institution, the ICE8000 credit institution may extend the term of the dissent right according to the actual situation. When the appraiser exercises the right of dissent, it shall be in accordance with the principle of reciprocity in writing to abide by this standard, the written commitment to abide by the principle of good faith and the moral conscience bottom line to exercise the right of dissent, and to make a statement of the attached conscience vows. If the appraiser disagrees and refuses to make the above promises and statements in writing, the objection is invalid or less effective.

(4) Issue the principle identification result. If the appraiser does not effectively exercise the right of dissent, the ICE8000 credit institution shall issue to the applicant the "Principal Appraisal Opinions on the Qualified Bottom Line Behavior" or the "Appraisal Opinions on the Principles of Unethical Conduct". Otherwise, the applicant shall be issued a Notice of Finalization of the Principled Appraisal Procedure. If the applicant believes that the appraiser has violated the principle of good faith and exercises the right of dissent, he may be held liable for breach of contract.

6.2 In the course of practicing, the ICE8000 credit institution may issue a principled appraisal opinion on the discovered [in line with moral conscience bottom line behavior] or unethical behavior in the practice document, but shall deliver the relevant practice documents to the parties and inform them according to relevant practice standards. Party objection period and objection method.

When people use the ICE8000 international credit standard system standard to publish credit evaluation information, they can issue relevant appraisal opinions on relevant [ethical conscience bottom line behaviors] or unethical behaviors in relevant documents, but they should serve relevant documents to the parties, and Inform the parties of the objection period and the objection method according to relevant standards.

Chapter VII Advice Procedure

7.1 The adherence and maintenance of the moral bottom line by personnel in a region is one of the important foundations of civilization in the region. The level of civilization in the region has an invaluable impact on the well-being of all personnel and future generations in the region.

7.2 People's personality is not easy to change, but the moral bottom line of people can be established, and people's morality can be improved.

7.3 The persuasion referred to in this standard refers to advising organizations to correct unethical behavior through appropriate methods such as persuasion, exhortation, persuasion, and punishment.

The letter used by the ICE8000 credit institution or other organizations in the process of persuasion, regardless of the name, can be called the "persuasion letter."

7.4 For unethical behavior, people have the right to activate the persuasion procedure to require the perpetrator to correct. However, people do not have the right to activate the procedural requirements or force others to engage in noble behavior.

7.5 An unethical behavior, people can persuade according to internal complaints, public complaints and other standards, can also be persuaded according to the following procedures:

(1) Application. The parties concerned filed an application with the ICE8000 credit institution, promised to abide by this standard, and promised to abide by the principle of good faith, moral bottom line, and social responsibility bottom line to submit relevant evidence and materials, and at the same time make a statement of additional conscience vows. The ICE8000 credit institution may also initiate the persuasion procedure without the application of the relevant party.

(2) The ICE8000 credit institution writes the “persuasion letter” and delivers it, and at the same time, gives it a 7-day objection period. In the "Advise Good Letters", the warning clause can be added according to the actual situation.

(3) Objection and correction. If the relevant personnel raise a reasonable objection or correct the unethical behavior or give up the opportunity to make unethical behavior, the ICE8000 credit institution shall delete the "persuasion letter". Otherwise, the "Consultation Letter" should be retained for reference by a specific unit or individual. If necessary, the "Consultation Letter" can also be disclosed. In the case of "advising the good letter", if there is a warning clause, the punishment procedure shall be initiated in time according to the terms of the warning.

Chapter VIII Liability for breach of contract and method of investigation

8.1 If the party violates the provisions of this standard, it shall bear the following liability for breach of contract:

(1) The corresponding legal liability, namely: the legal punishment prescribed by the relevant applicable law.

(2) Corresponding credit responsibility, that is, to bear credit punishments such as internal complaints, public complaints, credit warnings, internal exposure, public exposure, joint exposure, etc.

(3) The corresponding industry self-discipline responsibility, namely: announcement of criticism, fines, cancellation of credit card, prohibition of self-discipline and other disciplines.

(4) If the breach of contract causes losses (including material damage and mental damage) to others, it shall be liable for compensation. If the breach of contract constitutes a malicious dishonesty, it shall also make punitive damages to the infringed person in accordance with international practice and the principle of common law.

8.2 Method of investigation of liability for breach of contract:

(1) According to the "ICS8000 International Credit Standard System Internal Complaint Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Public Complaint Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Credit Warning Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Internal Exposure Standard" or "ICE8000" International Exposure Standards for Public Credit Standards or Joint Exposure Standards for ICE8000 International Credit Standards System for credit complaints and credit penalties;

(2) Applying for arbitration under the International Credit Dispute Arbitration Commission in accordance with the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System International Credit Dispute Arbitration Standard, without the need to submit a separate arbitration agreement;

(3) Apply to the International Moral Court for trial in accordance with the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System International Credit Dispute Trial Standard;

(4) If the defaulter has the membership of the World Credit Organization [WCO], the parties also have the right to make a complaint in accordance with the World Credit Organization [WCO] Member Supervision Standards;

(5) File a lawsuit in the US Delaware Court or the US Federal Court in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware or the United States federal law.

8.3 Violations of the provisions of this standard may and should be considered as an independent breach of contract or untrustworthy behavior. If the relevant parties appear in the process of applying this standard, such acts as fraudulent, covert, defamatory, insulting, and denying others' credit evaluation rights, the act is an independent malicious dishonesty act or an independent serious malicious dishonesty. The parties concerned have the right to merge. Investigate or separately pursue the responsibility of the independent dishonesty.

8.4 The responsibility for breach of contract in this standard shall be based on the principle of ignoring:

(1) Only the aggrieved party will take the initiative to pursue the investigation, and the defaulting party will bear the corresponding liability for breach of contract;

(2) The aggrieved party has the right to decide whether to initiate the corresponding accountability procedure for breach of contract;

(3) The aggrieved party has the right to understand the defaulting party or reach an agreement with the defaulting party.

8.5 For the employee or agent who participates in, performs, or assists the party to breach the contract, the aggrieved party has the right to pursue its corresponding responsibility unless it proves that it is not at fault.

8.6 The World Credit Organization [WCO] shall bear economic compensation for its own faults, and the expenditure for economic compensation shall be included in the financial plan of the World Credit Organization [WCO] for the next year. If the economic compensation is large, compensation shall be made in each year.

After accepting economic compensation, the World Credit Organization [WCO] has the right to recover losses from units or individuals responsible for acts of dishonesty with gross negligence or subjective intent.

Chapter IX Supplementary Provisions

9.1 The methods of “delivery” and “notification” as mentioned in this standard include:

(1) Integrity letter delivery\notice. The sender/notifier can send a letter of integrity to the recipient/notice according to the “ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Integrity Letter Management Standard”. The time of receipt of the document as specified in the standard is the delivery/notification time.

(2) Regular letter delivery\notice. The sender/notifier may send a regular letter to the recipient/notifier, and the time of receipt of the letter by the person to be served, the person to be notified and his/her employee, adult family member or agent shall be the time of delivery/notification.

(3) Network announcement delivery\notification. If the sender/notifier cannot be served by letter, the right to use the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Document Announcement Delivery Standard shall be served by the network announcement method. If the delivery/notification is made by means of network announcement, the delivery/notification time will be the 60th day after the first publication of the delivery announcement.

(4) Other legal and reasonable delivery/notification methods.

9.2 This standard shall be implemented as of the date of promulgation.

9.3 The terminology involved in this standard, if its meaning is not agreed in this standard, its meaning is described in the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Industry Terminology.

9.4 All relevant parties submit various types of materials submitted to the World Credit Organization [WCO] (or ICE8000 Credit Agency) in accordance with this standard. For the copyright agreement, see the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Document Copyright Management Standard.

9.5 If the relevant parties know or ought to have known that any of the terms or conditions of this standard have not been complied with, but still do not expressly file a written objection in time for this non-compliance, it is deemed to waive their right to file an objection. The waiving party shall bear the legal consequences such as losses caused by the waiver, and the World Credit Organization [WCO] and other parties shall not be responsible for this.

9.6 This standard will be revised and improved. All parties applying this standard should pay full attention to the revision of this standard and apply the latest version of this standard, but the behavior that occurred before the revision of this standard may not be subject to the new revised clause. The official website of the latest Chinese version of this standard is: https://www.ice8000.org/aenhw/gc/111.html .

9.7 The copyright of this standard belongs to the World Credit Organization [WCO], members can use it for free and unlimited use; non-members can use it for free, study, training, research, self-use, reprint, quote, adaptation, reference, reference if they indicate or declare the source. , reference. No unit or individual may plagiarize plagiarism or disguise plagiarism or otherwise infringe. Otherwise, we will jointly expose the infringing units, individuals and related personnel after the investigation of the infringement facts is clear (to issue a credit wanted order to the society). And reserves the right to pursue their legal responsibility. Do not infringe or infringe.

9.8 The standard version number is expressed as: ICE8000-abcd, where: the front-end ICE8000 indicates that this standard belongs to one of the standards of the ICE8000 international credit standard system; a is the serial number of the standard in the ICE8000 system standard, if this standard is Abolished, the serial number is sometimes transferred to other standards; b is the initial writing time of this standard; c is the latest revision time of this standard; d is the number of revisions of this standard.

9.9 This standard is interpreted by the World Credit Organization [WCO].