ICE8000 Conference Standards
ICE8000 International Credit Standards System
Conference Standard
(Version: ICE8000-101-20100615-20140902-3)
(No. 21 Council resolution, approved by the Third Council on August 19, 2010, issued by the President on August 27, 2011. August 19, 2011, August 19, 2014, August 18, 2019 The joint meeting was revised three times. For the sake of understanding, the Executive Council has annotated and annotated non-text.)
(This standard) Writer: Fang Bangjian; proposer: Fang Bangjian; deliberative body: World Credit Organization Council; effectiveness level: Council resolution
Chapter I General Provisions Chapter
2 Basic Codes of the Conference
Chapter III Work Arrangement, Mobilization Meeting, Reporting Meeting, Reporting Code Code
Chapter 4 Opinions Code of Association
Chapter 5 Brainstorming Code
Chapter 6 Experience Exchange Meeting, Seminar Code
Chapter VII Questionnaire, Consultation Code
Chapter 8 Press Conference Code
Chapter 9 Hearing Code Chapter 10 Code
of Decision Meeting
10.1 (Section 1) Definition of Decision Meeting and Conference Rights
10.2 (Section 2) Code of Conduct for Decision Meetings
10.3 (Section III) Code of Conduct for Conference Directors
10.4 (Section 4) How do participants exercise their right to speak
10.5 (Section 5) How do participants exercise the right to ask questions?
10.6 (Section 6) How do participants exercise corrective powers?
10.7 (Section 7) How do participants exercise the right to move
10.8 (Section 8) How do participants exercise the right of attachment?
10.9 (Section IX) How participants can exercise the right to propose
10.10 (Section 10) How participants can exercise their voting rights
10.11 (Chapter 11) Debate Code
10.12 (Section 12) Procedures for the holding of decision-making meetings
Chapter XI Liability for Breach of Contract and Method of Investigation
Chapter 12 Supplementary Provisions
Chapter I General Provisions
1.1 In order to ensure the fairness, impartiality, efficiency and science of the conference, promote social integrity, reduce transaction costs, and enhance human well-being, the World Credit Organization [WCO] has formulated this standard in accordance with international legal principles and international practices, drawing on Robert's deliberative standards.
1.2 The main legal basis for the development, application and implementation of this standard is as follows:
(1) The principle of freedom of the Constitution. The constitutions of the vast majority of countries in the world give people the freedom to defend their legitimate rights, the freedom to maintain social justice and the freedom to express their opinions.
(2) The principle of public order and goodness of law. This legal principle gives people the right to maintain social justice. The basic principles of civil law in most countries of the world include the principles of public order and good customs.
(3) The principle of good faith in law. This legal principle gives people the obligation of good faith. Most countries in the world regard the principle of good faith as the basic law of their civil and commercial laws.
(4) The principle of freedom of contract in law, also known as the principle of free agreement. This legal principle gives people the freedom to enter into a civil contract. The basic principles of civil law in most countries of the world include the principle of freedom of contract.
1.3 The conduct of the application and implementation of this standard shall be deemed to be the tripartite or multi-party contractual act of the World Credit Organization [WCO] in Delaware, USA, as an attestation or supervisor, and The relevant disputes arising from this act are applicable to and protected by the laws of the State of Delaware and the United States, and the jurisdiction is also the International Court of Ethics or the Delaware Court of the United States and the United States Federal Court. If the parties have agreed otherwise or otherwise stated in the applicable law and/or jurisdiction, the binding does not involve the World Credit Organization [WCO].
1.4 This standard divides meetings into the following types:
(1) Work arrangement meeting, mobilization meeting, and reporting meeting;
(2) Consultation meeting;
(3) Brainstorming;
(4) Experience exchange meetings and seminars;
(5) Consultation meeting, consultation meeting;
(6) Press conference;
(7) Hearing;
(8) Decision-making meeting.
In addition to the basic rules of the meeting, different types of meetings follow different rules of the meeting.
1.5 The World Credit Organization [WCO], ICE8000 Credit Institution, and Integrity Organization hold meetings to apply this standard. Other organizations may convene a meeting to voluntarily apply this standard.
Meetings that voluntarily apply this standard shall indicate in the meeting documents or declare in the meeting that “the meeting shall apply the “ICE8000 International Credit Standards System Meeting Standards””.
Once this standard is applicable, the relevant requirements of the relevant laws, ICE8000 standards, and articles of association shall be regarded as an integral part of this standard.
1.6 All parties applying this standard shall abide by the principle of good faith, moral bottom line and social responsibility bottom line in the process of applying this standard, and exercise and assume the rights and obligations stipulated in this standard.
1.7 All parties to this standard are deemed to have fully understood and committed to comply with all the terms of this standard. However, if any party to this standard finds any unfairness in any of the provisions of this standard, it has the right to publicly declare that it is not subject to public disclosure of the relevant circumstances and reasons and written notice to the World Credit Organization [WCO]. Terms and conditions.
Chapter II Basic Code of the Conference
2.1 Regardless of the type of meeting, participants should adhere to the following basic rules:
(1) Can not interrupt others to speak. Unless otherwise specified or otherwise agreed, only the moderator or conference director has the right to interrupt others, while others cannot interrupt others.
(2) Personal attacks cannot be carried out. What is personal attack? See clause 2.2.
(3) Do not question or comment on the motives, habits or preferences of others.
(4) The topic cannot be transferred, that is, it cannot be ran off. All statements must be made around the current topic, except for brainstorming.
(5) Do not speak loudly or otherwise disturb the venue.
(6) The principle of good faith should be observed when speaking or submitting conference materials.
2.2 Participants who have the following actions constitute a personal attack:
(1) violence or attempting to violently attack others;
(2) threatening to attack others with violence;
(3) cursing and cursing others;
(4) Exposing and laughing at the physical defects and personal privacy of others;
(5) use inappropriate words to devalue others;
(6) accusing others of bad motives;
(7) refers to mulberry, insinuating others with bad words;
(8) mocking or ridiculing the speech of others;
(9) Other acts of personal injury to the participants.
2.3 Objections and criticisms of other people's opinions and opinions do not constitute personal attacks.
2.4 Personal assault is a violation and should be stopped and should be subject to appropriate penalties.
2.5 Mantra, refers to the idioms attached to a person's speech. Considering that in most cases, the mantra is an unintentional act. Therefore, the mantra is not regarded as a personal assault. However, if it is corrected, the party should immediately make a verbal apology. If you refuse to apologize, it is a violation and should be punished.
2.6 If the majority of the participants, according to the principle of conscience, believe that the parties intentionally slandered others with verbal harassment, or the parties themselves admitted to be deliberate, they should be considered as personal attacks.
Chapter III Code of Work, Mobilization, Reporting, and Reporting
3.1 Assigning work to participants, conveying guidelines, instructions, resolutions, or mobilizing work for participants, or listening to participants' work reports and reports, may be called work placement meetings or work mobilization meetings or work reports. Meeting or work report meeting. In the meeting notice or meeting materials, the type of meeting should be clearly stated as: work placement meeting or work mobilization meeting or work report meeting or work report meeting.
3.2 The staff of the work arrangement meeting, the mobilization meeting, the report meeting, and the meeting will be appointed by the meeting organizer. Generally, the leader or the leader of the leading group may act as the moderator.
3.3 Participants do not have the right to speak unless the moderator or leader agrees to speak or ask for their speech.
3.4 Participants should listen carefully to the speeches of the relevant leaders, and must not have to speak in disorder, or sleep or answer the phone, etc., otherwise the host or the leader has the right to stop or impose penalties.
3.5 Work arrangement or mobilization meeting or briefing or reporting meeting, in addition to the host can interrupt and stop others from speaking, the superior also has the right to interrupt and stop the lower level speech. Leaders also have the right to make work instructions, arrangements or mobilization after listening to work reports.
3.6 If necessary, the oral instructions and requirements of the leader in the meeting can be compiled into the minutes of the meeting, and signed by the leader and sent to the relevant parties.
3.7 Work placement meeting or mobilization meeting or reporting meeting:
(1) The relevant personnel shall issue a notice of the meeting according to the leadership arrangement;
(2) Whether it is necessary to issue the conference materials, as the case may be, if the conference materials are printed, the contents of this chapter and the contents of Chapter 2 should be listed in the conference materials;
(3) Participants will be notified at the meeting and the meeting will be held;
(4) The moderator announced that the meeting was over.
Chapter IV Code of Conduct for Solicitation
4.1 Meetings for comments, suggestions, and problem solving on one or some matters may be called a solicitation meeting. In the meeting notice or meeting materials, the type of meeting should be clearly stated: the call for comments.
4.2 The moderator of the symposium shall be appointed by the organizer of the meeting. Generally, the leader of the levy unit or the member of the leading group may be the moderator, so that they can fully consult the opinions.
4.3 Participants do not have the right to speak unless the moderator or the relevant leader agrees to speak or ask for their speech.
4.4 If the commenter deems it necessary, it may debate each other's opinions. The rules of the debate shall refer to the debate code in the decision-making meeting, and the moderator shall also refer to the moderator's code in the decision-making meeting to allow the host to Both parties are fair and full of opinions.
4.5 Unless the commenter or moderator explicitly objects to the participants to express their opinions, the participants are obliged to fully express their true opinions and strive to do so: knowing everything and saying nothing.
4.6 The right to speak of the Opinions Committee shall be distributed by the moderator. According to the meeting, the moderator may request to take turns to speak or raise a hand to speak or to speak or speak freely. (Free speaking means that as long as you do not interrupt others, after the other person’s speech ends You can speak without the permission of the moderator. You can also limit the maximum speaking time or the shortest speaking time or the maximum number of times or the minimum number of times.
4.7 Procedures for the holding of the consultation meeting:
(1) If possible, the meeting notice shall be issued in advance, and the content of the meeting shall be clarified in the notice of the meeting so that the participants can study and prepare in advance for the matters solicited opinions;
(2) If possible, publish the conference materials as much as possible. The contents of this chapter and the contents of Chapter 2 should be listed in the conference materials;
(3) Participants will be notified at the meeting and the meeting will be held;
(4) The moderator announced that the meeting was over.
Chapter 5 Brainstorming Code
5.1 A meeting for inspiration can be called a brainstorming session. In the meeting notice or meeting materials, the type of meeting should be clearly stated: brainstorming.
5.2 The host of the brainstorming session, designated by the organizer of the meeting.
5.3 Brainstorming, efforts should be made to encourage participants to express their unconventional ideas and inspire their inspiration.
5.4 Brainstorming, there is no need to have issues, or there are issues but not to be obeyed.
5.5 Brainstorming, there should be no time limit for speaking. Unless there is a personal attack with obvious harm, the host should not interrupt the speaker.
5.6 Brainstorming sessions should generally be free speeches (free speaking means that as long as you don't interrupt others, you can speak after someone else has finished speaking, without having to apply for permission from the host). When no one is willing to take the initiative to speak, you can take turns to speak. When you take turns speaking, as long as someone else finishes speaking, others can speak directly and automatically switch to free speech.
5.7 The process of brainstorming:
(1) If possible, the meeting notice should be issued in advance, and the meeting content should be clearly specified in the meeting notice so that the participants can think about the problem in advance so as to generate inspiration;
(2) If possible, publish the conference materials as much as possible. The contents of this chapter and the contents of Chapter 2 should be listed in the conference materials;
(3) Participants will be notified at the meeting and the meeting will be held;
(4) The moderator announces the end of the meeting.
Chapter VI Experience Exchange Meeting, Seminar Code
6.1 Participants share a meeting to exchange experiences and lessons, which can be called an experience exchange meeting; participants can study, discuss, express opinions, and exchange meetings on specific topics, which can be called seminars. In the meeting notice or meeting materials, the type of meeting should be clearly stated: experience exchange meeting, seminar.
6.2 The experience exchange meeting and the moderator of the seminar shall be designated by the organizer of the meeting.
6.3 The exchange of experience and seminars shall be distributed by the moderator. According to the situation of the meeting, the moderator may request to take turns to speak or raise a hand or speak or speak freely. (Free speech means speaking to others as long as they do not interrupt others. You can speak after the end, without the permission of the moderator. You can also limit the maximum speaking time or the shortest speaking time or the maximum number of times or the minimum number of times.
6.4 Unless the participants expressly refuse or otherwise agree, the audio, video, and text materials of the participants are copyrighted by the participants, and the participants are responsible for the copyright and do not represent the views of the conference organizers. The organizer of the conference has the right to use the materials and whether the copyright fees are required to be paid by the parties in advance or afterwards.
6.5 Experience exchange meeting, seminar holding process:
(1) If possible, the meeting notice should be issued in advance, and the content of the meeting should be clearly stated in the notice of the meeting so that the participants can prepare the materials for the speech;
(2) If possible, publish the conference materials as much as possible. The contents of this chapter and the contents of Chapter 2 should be listed in the conference materials;
(3) Participants will be notified at the meeting and the meeting will be held;
(4) The moderator announced that the meeting was over.
Chapter VII Challenges and Consultation Codes
7.1 Meetings in which participants or individuals question and consult with relevant units or individuals may be called a questioning meeting or a consultation meeting. In the meeting notice or meeting materials, the type of meeting should be clearly stated: questioning meeting, consultation meeting.
7.2 The questioning meeting and the moderator of the consultation meeting shall be designated by the organizer of the meeting.
7.3 Participants should ask the moderator for the right to speak, unless the moderator announces free questioning. (Free questioning means that as long as you don't interrupt others, you can speak after someone else has finished speaking, without having to apply for permission from the host).
7.4 When the number of questions is too large, the moderator can limit the time of questioning and the number of questions.
7.5 The questioner should listen carefully and cannot repeat the question that has been answered.
7.6 Consultation meeting, consultation meeting:
(1) If possible, the meeting notice shall be issued in advance, and the contents of the meeting shall be clarified in the notice of the meeting so that the parties can prepare in advance;
(2) If possible, publish the conference materials as much as possible. The contents of this chapter and the contents of Chapter 2 should be listed in the conference materials;
(3) Participants will be notified at the meeting and the meeting will be held;
(4) The moderator announced that the meeting was over.
Chapter VIII Press Conference Code
8.1 A conference that simultaneously publishes news to multiple news media or/and simultaneously accepts multiple news media questions may be referred to as a press conference. In the meeting notice or meeting materials, the type of meeting should be clearly stated as: press conference.
8.2 The host of the press conference shall be designated by the organizer of the conference.
8.3 If the reporter asks questions, he should apply to the moderator for the right to speak, unless the moderator announces free questioning. (Free questioning means that as long as you don't interrupt others, you can ask questions after someone else has finished speaking, without having to apply for permission from the host).
8.4 When the number of questions is too large, the moderator can limit the time of questioning and the number of questions.
8.5 The proceedings of the press conference:
(1) If possible, the meeting notice shall be issued in advance, and the contents of the meeting shall be clarified in the notice of the meeting so that the parties can prepare in advance;
(2) If possible, publish the conference materials as much as possible. The contents of this chapter and the contents of Chapter 2 should be listed in the conference materials;
(3) Participants will be notified at the meeting and the meeting will be held;
(4) The moderator announced that the meeting was over.
Chapter IX Hearing Rules
9.1 Hearing a meeting in which both positive and negative parties or multi-stakeholders express their opinions and cross-examination can be called a hearing. In the meeting notice or meeting materials, the type of meeting should be clearly stated as: Hearing.
9.2 The moderator of the hearing shall be appointed by the organizer of the meeting. Generally, the person who is familiar with the standards or laws of the meeting shall be the moderator, so that the parties can express their opinions fairly.
9.3 Participants do not have the right to speak unless the moderator agrees to speak or ask for their speech.
9.4 The moderator shall allow the parties to debate each other's evidence or claims. The rules of the debate shall refer to the debate code in the decision-making meeting, and the moderator shall also refer to the moderator's code in the decision-making meeting to preside. Both parties express their opinions fairly and fully.
9.5 The moderator shall allow the attorney of the party to ask questions of the other party or witness.
9.6 The lawyer of the party, if he believes that a speech or question, violates the law or the standards of the conference or violates the legitimate rights and interests of a client, has the right to interrupt the speech of the party and ask the moderator to prohibit the speech or question. Whether to prohibit the speech or question is decided by the moderator.
9.7 Hearing proceedings:
(1) If possible, the meeting notice should be issued in advance, and the meeting content should be clearly specified in the meeting notice so that the participants can prepare in advance;
(2) If possible, publish the conference materials as much as possible. The contents of this chapter and the contents of Chapter 2 should be listed in the conference materials;
(3) Participants will be notified at the meeting and the meeting will be held;
(4) The moderator announced that the meeting was over.
ecision Meeting
10.1 (Section 1) Definition of Decision Meeting and Conference Rights
10.1.1 A meeting for the majority opinion and voting for a resolution may be called a decision meeting, such as a board meeting, a board meeting, a board of supervisors meeting, a member meeting, a shareholder meeting, etc. In the meeting notice or meeting materials, the type of meeting should be clearly stated as: decision meeting.
10.1.2 Types of conference rights for decision-making conferences, including the following eight:
(1) The right to speak.
The right to express opinions and reasons on the issue is the right to speak.
(2) The right to ask questions.
The right to ask a specific person is the right to ask questions.
(3) Correction right.
The right to propose corrective opinions on matters that violate the standards of the meeting is the right to correct the error.
(4) The right to move.
The right to propose actions to the meeting orally is the right to move.
(5) The right to attach.
Agreeing with the motion of others as the right of the joint mover is the right of attachment.
(6) The right to propose.
The right to submit a motion to the meeting in writing is the right to propose.
(7) Voting rights.
Express your right to decide on the right to vote.
10.1.3 The conference participants' rights shall be allocated by the conference organizer according to the actual situation.
10.1.4 The organizer of the conference shall make a “Participant and Conference Rights Allocation Table” to clarify the position (or identity) and conference rights of the participants.
10.1.5 Wherever possible, the decision-making process should be faithfully recorded in an appropriate manner to increase the traceability of the meeting to determine responsibility and disputes.
10.2 (Section 2) Code of Conduct for Decision Meetings
(Note: This section is only for the moderator of the decision meeting. The moderators of other types of meetings do not have to comply with this Code unless otherwise agreed or specified)
10.2.1 The moderator of the decision-making meeting (hereinafter referred to as the moderator) shall be elected in accordance with the relevant provisions of laws and regulations. Where the relevant provisions of laws, regulations, etc. do not stipulate how the moderator produces, the convener of the meeting or the person with the highest position shall serve, if the person is unwilling to serve or authorize others
In the case of a meeting, a person is temporarily elected as the moderator.
10.2.2 The moderator has the right to authorize others to act as the moderator instead of himself. He also has the right to terminate the authorization at any time.
10.2.3 If necessary, the conference organizer may set the first moderator, the second moderator, and the Nth moderator as co-hosts. When the host in the previous order participates in the debate or fails to host for any reason, or fails When effectively maintaining the order of the meeting, the host of the next order has the right to conduct the host in time. Although co-hosts share host rights, they still need to exercise chairing rights in order.
10.2.4 The powers of the decision-making conference host include:
(1) announce the beginning of the meeting and the end of the meeting;
(2) Assigning the right to speak and ask questions;
(3) Confirm the motion and ask "whether someone has seconded the motion";
(4) Confirm the second action and announce the entry into the debate process;
(5) Confirm whether the error correction is successful. After listening to the corrective person's speech, confirm whether the error correction opinion is correct. If it is correct, ask the relevant party to correct the error;
(6) After the debate is over, a vote is drawn;
(7) When it is considered that a statement is in violation, it has the right to interrupt or stop its speech, but should briefly state the reasons for the violation;
(8) The moderator has the right to ask the meeting to restore order when there is confusion in the speech. You can call "attention to order!", if there is a raft, you can strike it properly;
(9) If the participant violates the standards of the meeting and does not obey the host's suppression, the moderator has the right to prohibit him from speaking or expelling him from the venue;
(10) In order to guarantee the quality of the meeting, if the moderator has reason to believe that the content of a speech or topic has not been understood or understood by the participants, the moderator has the right to request the speaker or the sponsor to speak on it or The content of the topic, explanation or re-speech, also has the right to suspend the meeting, give participants a reasonable reading and thinking time, and then re-continue the meeting agenda.
(11) In order to maintain the order of the meeting and implement the meeting standards, the moderator has the right to adopt other appropriate measures.
10.2.5 The obligations of the moderator of the decision meeting include:
(1) The moderator should carefully study the standards of this meeting before presiding over the meeting.
(2) When the moderator announces the start of the meeting, he should first introduce himself and explain that he has the right to preside over the meeting (for example, I am the new chairman of the board of directors, and preside over the board meeting according to the company's articles of association; Yes, I am authorized by the Chairman of the Board of Directors to preside over this board meeting, unless it is obviously not necessary. Moreover, the moderator should ask: Is there any objection to my host qualification?
(3) After the meeting begins, the moderator should ask: Has anyone found the participant's qualifications wrong? Did someone find that there is a mistake in the rights of participants? Some people have found that the number of participants is wrong. Is there any objection to the minimum number of people meeting in the meeting?
(4) The moderator should distribute the right to speak and ask questions fairly, especially for the pros and cons of an issue, and should give a fair voice and the right to ask questions;
(5) The moderator shall not participate in the debate on the content of the meeting during the presiding period, and may not comment on the content of the debate, nor summarize the statement of any person. If the moderator really wants to comment on the current issue or need to avoid it because of interest, then the temporary position is required and a temporary host (or co-host, if any) is authorized to host until the vote ends. . (Note is not the main text, it belongs to the explanatory text added by the sponsor for easy understanding. The following is the same. Note: The moderator does not participate in the debate, and does not comment or summarize the speech. The purpose is to prevent the host from expressing tendency opinions or using the moderator's monopoly to speak. The right or moderator occupies the speaking time of the participants and affects the quality of the meeting.)
(6) During the meeting, the moderator may not move the motion, including the motion that “shelve the current issue and discuss it later”. If the moderator wishes to move a motion during the meeting, it is necessary to give up the chair and authorize a temporary host (or co-host, if any) to host until the vote is over. (Note: The moderator has the right to speak. If there is a motion, it is easy to abuse the right, which will cause the meeting to deviate from the original plan.)
10.2.6 The moderator's handling of the motion:
(1) Motion: After the mover has obtained the right to speak, he will move a motion in the form of "I have a motion...".
(2) Secondly: Except for the moderator and the mover, any other participant with the right of pretense does not need to obtain a voice if he thinks that the motion should be debated now. You can raise your hand and shout "I agree!". As long as the motion is subject to a vote (the law, the charter and other documents have provisions on the number of votes attached, the provisions of the regulations), the moderator shall announce the entry into the debate procedure. If no one is seconding, the moderator should announce it once, is there anyone to sue? If it still does not, the motion should be declared invalid.
(3) Confirmation of the second action: After the motion is seconded, the moderator must bring the meeting to debate. For example, it can be announced as follows: "A certain person has moved a motion, someone has seconded it... and now the debate is started."
(4) Debate: For example, the moderator can say: "The motion is now in the debate stage. To facilitate the debate, please agree that the motion is sitting on the right, against the motion sitting on the left, and the middle is sitting in the middle. You can change your position yourself. Please debate the pros and cons of the current motion. Please pay attention to the debate code. Please let the party speak first." The moderator can adopt and change different voice distribution methods according to the actual situation, such as: raising a hand, speaking in turn, freely speaking, etc.
(5) Voting: After the debate is over, the moderator will ask the meeting to vote on the “whether or not to pass a certain motion”.
(6) Announcement of results: The result of the vote announced by the moderator.
10.2.7 The host's handling of the motion:
(1) Request the proposer to state the proposal: It can be declared as follows: “A certain proposal is submitted to the meeting, and the proposal is in conformity with the conditions of the meeting. The sponsor is asked to explain and explain the proposal.
(2) Debate: For example, the moderator can say: “The sponsor has explained and explained the proposal and is now in the debate stage. To facilitate the debate, please agree that the proposal is sitting on the right, against the proposal sitting on the left, sitting in the middle. In the middle. If you change your point of view in the middle of the debate, you can change your position on your own. Please debate the pros and cons of the current proposal. Please pay attention to the code of conduct. Please let the party speak first." The moderator can adopt and change different ways of assigning the voice according to the actual situation, such as: raising a hand, speaking in turn, speaking freely, etc.".
(3) Voting: After the debate is over, the moderator will ask the meeting to vote on “whether or not to pass a certain motion”.
(4) Announcement of results: The result of the voting announced by the moderator.
10.3 (Section III) Code of Conduct for Conference Directors
10.3.1 If necessary, the organizer of the decision-making meeting may set up the director of the meeting, who will be familiar with the standards of the meeting, to help the moderator maintain the order of the meeting and ensure that the meeting is conducted according to standards. It is also possible to set up a deputy director of the conference to assist the director.
10.3.2 The powers of the Conference Director include:
(1) When a statement (including the moderator) is found to be in violation of the rules, it has the right to interrupt or stop its speech, but should briefly state the reasons for the violation;
(2) When a speech or action is found that violates the standards of this meeting, it has the right to make and request corrections, but the reasons should be outlined;
(3) When the participants have disputed whether a certain matter violates the standards of the meeting, conduct an on-site ruling and briefly explain the reasons.
10.3.3 The position director's obligation is to exercise only the powers stated in 10.3.2, not to expand the scope of self-power or abuse the power, nor to replace the moderator.
10.4 (Section 4) How do participants exercise their right to speak
10.4.1 Participants should exercise their right to speak. They should raise their hands to raise their hands or raise a "sign up to apply for a speech" or verbally apply for a speech. After obtaining the permission of the moderator, they should start speaking. However, if the host announces a free speech (free speaking means that as long as you do not interrupt others, you can speak after the other person has finished speaking, without having to apply for permission from the host), then the participants can hear the speech of others and then they can Speak. If the moderator announces a turn to speak, then it is his turn to speak, and no longer apply for permission from the moderator.
10.4.2 Due to the limited meeting time and conference resources, if multiple people win the right to speak, the moderator will distribute the fairness, and the moderator has the right to limit the number of speeches and the speaking time. Participants should abide by the number of speeches and the time limit for speaking, so as not to affect the voice of others.
10.4.3 If the participant has the right to speak and has applied for multiple times but has not been granted at one time, he may submit to the moderator that the moderator should give him at least one say.
10.4.4 After the participants have finished speaking, it is the responsibility to say: the speech is completed.
10.5 (Section 5) How do participants exercise the right to ask questions?
10.5.1 Participants should exercise their right to ask questions and should apply to the host to raise their hands or raise a "application to ask questions" or verbally. After obtaining the permission of the host, they will start to say: I have to ask questions, then Briefly tell the content of your question. However, if the host announces free questioning (free questioning means that as long as you don't interrupt others, you can ask questions after someone else has finished speaking, without having to apply for permission from the host), then the participants can hear the others finish speaking. Ask a question. If the host announces a turn to ask questions, then it is their turn to ask questions, and no longer apply for permission from the host.
10.5.2 Due to the limited meeting time and meeting resources, if multiple people seek the right to ask questions, the moderator will distribute the fairness, and the moderator has the right to limit the number of questions and the time of questioning. Participants should abide by the number of questions and the time limit for questioning, so as not to affect the right to ask questions.
10.5.3 If the participant has the right to ask questions and has applied for multiple questions but has not been granted at one time, he may indicate to the moderator that the moderator should give him at least one question.
10.5.4 Participants cannot ask questions that are duplicated by others.
10.4.5 After the participants have completed the question, it is the responsibility to say: the question is completed or the speech is completed.
10.6 (Section 6) How do participants exercise corrective powers?
10.6.1 Participants with corrective rights have the right to correct the following matters, and the exercise of the right of correcting the error shall be made according to the time limit specified below. Otherwise, it shall be deemed as abandoning the right to correct the error and shall not affect the conduct of the meeting. The effectiveness of the meeting results:
(1) The moderator does not have the qualification to host the meeting. The exercise of this right of correction shall be made immediately after the moderator announces that “someone has any objection to my moderator’s qualifications”.
(2) Participants are not eligible to participate. The exercise of this item for correcting the error should be made immediately after the moderator announces that “someone found that the qualification of the participant is wrong”.
(3) The allocation of the right to speak, the right to ask questions, and the right to correct errors in the list of participants does not comply with the relevant regulations. The exercise of this right of correction shall be made immediately after the moderator announces that "someone found that the rights of the participants are wrongly assigned".
(4) The number of participants did not meet the minimum requirements. The exercise of this right of correction shall be made immediately after the moderator announces that “Is there any mistake in the number of participants, and whether there is any objection to the minimum number of participants in the meeting?”
(5) The number of proposers or the number of people does not meet the requirements of the proposal. The exercise of this right of correction shall be made immediately after the moderator announces the debate on the proposal.
(6) A person who does not have the right to speak or make a statement. The exercise of this right of correction shall be made immediately upon the request of the party or after the statement.
(7) Personnel who do not have the right to ask for questions or ask questions. The exercise of this right of correction shall be made immediately upon the request of the party or after the question.
(8) Personnel who do not have the right to correct the error require or correct the error. The exercise of this right of correction shall be made immediately upon the request of the parties for correction or correction.
(9) A person who does not have the right to move proposes a motion. The exercise of this right of correction shall be made immediately upon the request of the party or after the motion.
(10) A person who does not have the right of attachment has a second opinion. The exercise of this right of correction shall be made immediately upon the request of the parties for attachment or after the second meeting.
(11) A person who does not have the right to vote shall vote. The exercise of this right of correction shall be made immediately upon the request of the party, or during the voting or after the voting.
(12) The host violates this standard when presiding over the meeting. The exercise of this right of correction shall be made immediately after the host has violated this standard.
(13) Other matters that violate the standards of the meeting. The exercise of this right of correction shall be made immediately after the occurrence of the error and before the next meeting procedure is actually carried out.
10.6.2 Participants exercise the right of correcting errors and cannot interrupt others' speeches.
10.6.3 When the participant exercises the right of correcting the error, the object facing can only be the moderator, not the wrong party, so as not to cause conflict and influence others to speak. The corrector should raise the right to speak or verbally apply for the right to speak, or raise the eye-catching sign with the words "I want to correct" for the host. After getting the right to speak, say to the host, "I want Correct the error, then state the error and briefly explain the reason.
10.7 (Section 7) How do participants exercise the right to move
10.7.1 Participants must first obtain the right to speak when exercising their right to move (see section on how to exercise their right to speak). After the participants have obtained the right to speak, they can move the motion, however. The expression must be: "I have a motion..." so that others can immediately know that it is a motion and not something else. For example: "I have a motion. The motion is: change the third item of Article 6 of the motion to: ...." Another example: "I have a motion to set aside the current motion and discuss it in the future."
10.7.2 If time permits, the mover may briefly state the reasons for his motion to obtain a second objection from others. However, the content of the motion must be briefly described before the reason for the motion can be briefly described.
10.7.3 After a motion has been filed, if no one is seconded, the motion is immediately invalid and will no longer enter the debate process.
10.7.4 The motion may be amended or the motion may be set aside (shelving the current issue and revisiting it later). However, the motion itself cannot be amended. It can only be put on hold to avoid shifting the topic and deviating from the motion. If it is considered that a motion needs to be amended, it may object to the motion. After the voting of the motion is over, a new amendment motion is proposed.
10.7.5 The suspension motion proposed by the participants shall meet or exceed two-thirds of the participants before they can pass.
10.7.6 If an issue has not been completed, the new motion should be relevant to the current issue. The moderator should stop the motion that is clearly unrelated to the current issue.
10.7.7 If the participants believe that the current debate is too long and affect the voting of the motion, they may propose a motion to end the current debate. For such motions, after the representatives of the pros and cons have sent a speech, they will vote. No need to go through the debate process.
10.8 (Section 8) How do participants exercise the right of attachment?
10.8.1 Participants exercise the right of second party. They do not need to obtain the right to speak first. After the speaker has finished speaking, he can say: "I secondly," can also be: The moderator said that someone has seconded the motion just now? Or after the corresponding language, say: "I secondly."
10.8.2 Participants believe that a motion is correct and can be seconded, or although it is not considered correct, it is considered to be worthy of entering the debate.
10.8.3 A participant's second motion on a motion does not mean that he supports the motion, nor does he vote for it in the future. The second person has the right to change his or her opinion.
10.9 (Section IX) How participants can exercise the right to propose
10.9.1 Participants shall exercise the right of proposal in written form and shall be held at the stage of the proposal before the meeting. If the proposal is suddenly made during the meeting, the organizer or moderator of the meeting has the right to refuse to be included in the meeting schedule on the grounds of time constraints.
10.9.2 Participants shall exercise the right of proposal and shall meet the conditions for the proposal of the law, articles of association or related documents. For example, Article 6.4 of the Articles of Association of the World Credit Organization stipulates that after one-tenth of the same type of directors proposes, the bill can be submitted to the same type of council. If there are 20 directors in the board of credit agencies, the two credit agency directors will have the right to make proposals. If the credit institution council has a total of 10 or less directors, then a credit agency director has the right to make a proposal.
10.9.3 After the successful execution of the proposal, the proposal becomes a proposal and should be included in the agenda and meeting materials for the participants to debate and vote.
10.10 (Section 10) How participants can exercise their voting rights
10.10.1 After the moderator has announced the vote, the voting participants can vote.
10.10.2 The voting method is divided into registered or secret ballot voting, which can generally be carried out according to the following principles:
(1) Renminbi's reward and punishment shall be arbitrarily removed, by secret ballot;
(2) A vote on the matter shall be taken by a registered ballot, including: a show of hands and a signature vote.
10.10.3 The specific voting method shall be decided by the organizer or moderator of the meeting in accordance with the law, the articles of association and relevant documents.
10.10.4 A signed vote refers to the filling of one's own name in the three columns of [approval, opposition, abstention] in the voting form.
10.10.5 A motion or motion must be brought to the vote after the end of the debate process, except for motions that require the end of the debate procedure.
10.10.6 Only the moderator may request a vote. However, after the debate is over, the moderator should promptly vote.
10.10.7 At the time of voting, the moderator shall first vote in favor of the voting party, and then invite the voting party to vote. Do not ask the abstention party to vote. Those who have not voted are deemed to have abstained.
10.10.8 If the moderator has the right to vote at the meeting, he or she may vote, but if it is a show of hands, the moderator must make a final statement. (Note: to prevent participants from following the trend)
10.10.9 At the time of voting, no participant has the right to speak again and has no right to make any further explanation of his vote.
10.10.10 When the number of pros is more than the opponent and the minimum number of votes is reached, the motion is passed. If the pro-party and the opposition party draw or fail to meet the prescribed minimum number of votes, it is equal to failure. Where the laws, regulations, ICE8000 standards and other relevant documents provide otherwise, the provisions shall prevail.
10.10.11 If possible, the relevant meeting documents shall be produced according to the debate and voting of the meeting and signed by the participants. If the signature cannot be signed on the spot, it should be reissued after the event. At the time of the re-issuance, the participants may not refuse the re-issuance on the grounds of remorse. If the participant refuses to sign the contract or fails to reissue the visa without any reason, the relevant personnel may sign the visa on their behalf after indicating the reason.
10.11 (Chapter 11) Debate Code
10.11.1 After the moderator announces the entry into the debate, the participants can start the debate.
10.11.2 In the debate, the speaker should first indicate his or her position (for example, agree or disagree with the current issue) before explaining the reasons. So that the moderator can clearly understand his position, in order to be able to fairly distribute the speaking time and the number of speeches to the pros and cons.
10.11.3 If necessary, the moderator may ask the pros and cons of the debate to sit in different positions, such as: the person who agrees, the person sitting on the right, the person who is against, sitting on the left, the person in the middle sitting in the middle . Participants in the process of debate, change their position, you can sit on your own. However, attention should be paid to the venue of the debate. The participants should set their sights on the direction of the host and avoid the emotional conflicts between the two sides because of their gaze.
10.11.4 According to the actual situation such as whether the time is tense or not, the moderator determines the allocation of the right to speak, such as raising a hand, rotating the speaker, and speaking freely. It can also limit the number of times and the time of speaking. If the moderator limits the number of speeches and the time of the speech, participants should consciously abide by.
10.11.5 In decision-making meetings, participants, especially leaders, should establish such values: suppressing criticism or dissent, not only infringes the voting rights of the participants, but also increases the turnover rate of decision-making. Criticism or disagreement is precious. The existence of criticism or dissent is normal. Criticism or dissent cannot be regarded as hatred. Critics or dissidents must not be regarded as enemies.
10.11.6 Each participant has the right to strive to translate his or her personal opinions into meeting resolutions, but the expression of personal opinions and the formation of meeting resolutions are subject to the provisions of this standard.
10.11.7 Participants should exercise their right to speak. They should raise their hands or raise a "sign up" to apply for a speech or a verbal application. After obtaining the permission of the moderator, they should start speaking. However, if the host announces a free speech (free speaking means that as long as you do not interrupt others, you can speak after the other person has finished speaking, without having to apply for permission from the host), then the participants can hear the speech of others and then they can Speak. If the moderator announces a turn to speak, then it is his turn to speak, and no longer apply for permission from the moderator.
10.11.8 During the debate, the spokesperson's object of expression can only be the moderator, and it is not possible to conduct face-to-face debates directly with people with different opinions. (Note: This move is to prevent personal conflicts between the two sides of the debate and to form personal vengeance.)
10.11.9 When the moderator allows the applicant to speak, the moderator may declare “please ask Mr./Ms. to speak” and may reiterate the time limit and number of times the meeting is spoken.
10.11.10 If the participant does not apply for the right to speak, the moderator may assign the right to speak in turn according to the seat or the pros and cons or other orders. If the relevant person refuses to speak, it shall be deemed to give up the right to speak.
10.11.11 Participants interrupt others' speeches or defamation, and the moderator should immediately stop them.
10.11.12 The spokesperson shall stop speaking immediately after being interrupted by the moderator or the director of the meeting.
10.11.13 All debates must be conducted by the moderator. There is no direct debate between the participants, and no more insults, embarrassment or physical conflicts.
10.11.14 The debate must be relevant and must be centered around the current issue and should be centered around whether “the current issue should be adopted”. The moderator should stop speech that is clearly unrelated to the current issue.
10.11.15 The moderator should, as far as possible, allow both parties with opposite opinions to take the floor in turn to maintain balance.
10.11.16 If a motion to close the debate is passed, both the pros and cons have the right to send a representative to make a final statement. But the moderator can limit the time of the speech.
10.11.17 If no participant asks to speak again, or a motion to end the current debate is passed, or has reached legal or agreed debate time or readings (eg, first reading, second reading, third reading), then presided over The person should declare the end of the debate and enter the voting stage.
10.12 (Section 12) Procedures for the holding of decision-making meetings
10.12.1 Procedures for the normal decision-making meeting (applicable to routine meetings such as company board meetings or quarterly meetings):
(1) The organizer of the conference shall generally send a notice of the meeting 30 days in advance to inform the important time of the proposal time, the meeting time, the meeting place, etc. The proposal time is generally not less than 7 days;
(2) Prepare meeting materials according to the proposal, and the contents of this chapter and the contents of Chapter 2 should be listed in the meeting materials;
(3) The meeting materials should generally be distributed to the participants 7 days in advance so that they can read the meeting proposals in advance;
(4) The moderator announces the start of the meeting;
(5) Debate and vote on the proposal and related motions;
(6) The moderator announced the end of the meeting.
10.12.2 Procedure for the convening of an interim decision meeting (for decision making in urgent matters):
(1) The organizer of the meeting informs the relevant personnel to attend the meeting;
(2) The moderator announces the start of the meeting;
(3) Debate and vote on the proposal and related motions;
(4) The moderator announced the end of the meeting.
10.12.3 For ad hoc decision-making meetings, participants may propose a motion to shelve the relevant issues if they believe that they are not urgent.
Chapter 11: Liability for breach of contract and method of investigation
11.1 If the party violates the provisions of this standard, it shall bear the following liability for breach of contract:
(1) The corresponding legal liability, namely: the legal punishment prescribed by the relevant applicable law.
(2) Corresponding credit responsibility, that is, to bear credit punishments such as internal complaints, public complaints, credit warnings, internal exposure, public exposure, joint exposure, etc.
(3) The corresponding industry self-discipline responsibility, namely: announcement of criticism, fines, cancellation of credit card, prohibition of self-discipline and other disciplines.
(4) If the breach of contract causes losses (including material damage and mental damage) to others, it shall be liable for compensation. If the breach of contract constitutes a malicious dishonesty, it shall also make punitive damages to the infringed person in accordance with international practice and the principle of common law.
11.2 Method of investigation of breach of contract liability:
(1) According to the "ICS8000 International Credit Standard System Internal Complaint Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Public Complaint Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Credit Warning Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Internal Exposure Standard" or "ICE8000" International Exposure Standards for Public Credit Standards or Joint Exposure Standards for ICE8000 International Credit Standards System for credit complaints and credit penalties;
(2) Applying for arbitration under the International Credit Dispute Arbitration Commission in accordance with the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System International Credit Dispute Arbitration Standard, without the need to submit a separate arbitration agreement;
(3) Apply to the International Moral Court for trial in accordance with the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System International Credit Dispute Trial Standard;
(4) If the defaulter has the membership of the World Credit Organization [WCO], the parties also have the right to make a complaint in accordance with the World Credit Organization [WCO] Member Supervision Standards;
(5) File a lawsuit in the US Delaware Court or the US Federal Court in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware or the United States federal law.
11.3 The responsibility for breach of contract in this standard shall be based on the principle of ignoring:
(1) Only the aggrieved party will take the initiative to pursue the investigation, and the defaulting party will bear the corresponding liability for breach of contract;
(2) The aggrieved party has the right to decide whether to initiate the corresponding accountability procedure for breach of contract;
(3) The aggrieved party has the right to understand the defaulting party or reach an agreement with the defaulting party.
11.4 For the employee or agent who participates in, performs, or assists the party to breach the contract, the aggrieved party has the right to pursue its corresponding responsibility unless it proves that it is not at fault.
11.5 Violations of the provisions of this standard may and should be considered as an independent breach of contract or untrustworthy behavior. If the relevant parties appear in the process of applying this standard, such acts as fraudulent, covert, defamatory, insulting, and denying others' credit evaluation rights, the act is an independent malicious dishonesty act or an independent serious malicious dishonesty. The parties concerned have the right to merge. Investigate or separately pursue the responsibility of the independent dishonesty.
11.6 The World Credit Organization [WCO] shall bear economic compensation for its own faults, and the expenditure for economic compensation shall be included in the financial plan of the World Credit Organization [WCO] for the next year. If the economic compensation is large, compensation shall be made in each year.
After accepting economic compensation, the World Credit Organization [WCO] has the right to recover losses from units or individuals responsible for acts of dishonesty with gross negligence or subjective intent.
Chapter 12 Supplementary Provisions
12.1 The effectiveness level of this standard is the Council's resolution.
12.2 This standard shall be implemented as of the date of promulgation.
12.3 The terminology involved in this standard, if its meaning is not agreed in this standard, its meaning is described in the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Industry Terminology.
12.4 All kinds of materials submitted by relevant parties to the World Credit Organization [WCO] (or ICE8000 Credit Agency) in accordance with this standard, the copyright agreement of which is set out in the "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Document Copyright Management Standard".
12.5 If the relevant parties know or ought to have known that any of the terms or conditions of this standard have not been complied with, but still do not expressly file a written objection in time for this non-compliance, it is deemed to waive their right to file an objection. The waiving party shall bear the legal consequences such as losses caused by the waiver, and the World Credit Organization [WCO] and other parties shall not be responsible for this.
12.6 This standard will be revised and improved. All parties applying this standard should pay full attention to the revision of this standard and apply the latest version of this standard. However, the behavior that occurred before the revision of this standard may not be subject to the new revised clause. The official website of the latest Chinese version of this standard is: https://www.ice8000.org/aenhw/gc/101.html .
12.7 The copyright of this standard belongs to the World Credit Organization [WCO], members can use it for free and unlimited use; non-members can use it free of charge for study, training, research, self-use, reprint, citation, adaptation, reference, reference under the premise of indicating or declaring the source. , reference. No unit or individual may plagiarize plagiarism or disguise plagiarism or otherwise infringe. Otherwise, we will jointly expose the infringing units, individuals and related personnel after the investigation of the infringement facts is clear (to issue a credit wanted order to the society). And reserves the right to pursue their legal responsibility. Do not infringe or infringe.
12.8 The version number of this standard is expressed as: ICE8000-abcd, where: the front-end ICE8000 indicates that this standard is one of the standards of the ICE8000 international credit standard system; a is the serial number of the standard in the ICE8000 system standard, if this standard is Abolished, the serial number is sometimes transferred to other standards; b is the initial writing time of this standard; c is the latest revision time of this standard; d is the number of revisions of this standard.
12.9 This standard is interpreted by the World Credit Organization [WCO].
Your current location:
ICE8000 Conference Standards
- Previous standard: ICE80000 election standard
- Next Standard: World Credit Organization [WCO] Faction Management Standard
- Closely related: ICE8000 integrity autonomous organization management standards
- Closely related: World Credit Organization [WCO] Charter
- Back to: Complete Works of ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Standards
and Reduce transaction costs
and Improve human welfare
and Promote human progress
World Credit Organization (WCO) © 2002-2024,
Infringement will be investigated (a credit Wanted warrant will be issued)