Introduction to Appraisal of Evil Actions and Responsibility - World Credit Organization
Welcome,ice8000.org! To prevent counterfeiting, please look for the domain name: www.ice8000.org. Our mission: to promote social integrity, reduce transaction costs, enhance human well-being, and promote human integrity and progress. This online media is an online media sponsored by four units including the World Credit Organization (WCO), the International Moral Court [IMC], the World Integrity Organization (WIO), and the International Credit Dispute Arbitration Commission [ICDAC]. The name of this media is the International Credit Supervision Network, which can also be called the International Credit Standard Network, the International Credit Supervision Network, and the International Credit Standard Network. The ICE8000 standard is a standard to test whether a unit or an individual is truly honest.。
ICE8000 Evil Behavior and Responsibility Identification Column
Introduction to Illegal Behaviors and Attribution of Responsibility
Introduction to ICE8000 Evil Behaviors and Attribution of Responsibility< /strong>
Note: Some units or individuals did not engage in untrustworthy behavior, but their behavior indirectly stimulated and encouraged the untrustworthy behavior. To this end, the World Credit Organization (WCO) formulated the "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System for Evidence of Evil Actions and Attribution of Responsibility", and at the same time, established an information database for Evil Organizations.
The following content is excerpted from: "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Appraisal Standard for Evil Behavior and Responsibility Attribution"
Advising bad people to abandon evil and follow good, and refusing or suspending to provide support other than humanitarianism to bad people who do not listen to the advice, is the social responsibility that every human being on earth should assume. This social responsibility can be called "not supporting evil", The minimum standard content of social responsibility is the content of social responsibility that every individual, unit, and region should undertake. If everyone refuses to recognize or assume this social responsibility, the moral foundation of human beings will be eroded and human well-being will be lost.
The essence of evil support is a kind of [the bottom line behavior of refusing to assume social responsibility]. Although the act of supporting evil does not directly infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of others, there is a certain indirect causal relationship in the past or in the future that the act of supporting evil has caused the consequences of others or society being violated by untrustworthy acts.
After receiving a letter of persuasion or related letters from a third party, if you still do not listen to the advice and insist on providing support other than humanitarianism to [malicious dishonest persons or seriously dishonest persons] without legitimate reasons, it is an act of supporting evil.
Supporting evil behaviors, including but not limited to the following situations:
(1) Not listening to advice, insisting on purchasing products or services from the person responsible for malicious or seriously untrustworthy behavior without legitimate reasons;
(2) Not listening to advice, without legitimate reasons, insisting on selling products or services to those responsible for malicious or seriously untrustworthy conduct;
(3) Not listening to advice, without legitimate reasons, insisting on hiring or reusing persons responsible for malicious or seriously dishonest acts;
(4) Not listening to advice, without legitimate reasons, insisting on conducting other business cooperation with persons responsible for malicious dishonesty or serious dishonesty;
(5) Not listening to advice, without legitimate reasons, insisting on providing other [other than humanitarian] support for those responsible for malicious or seriously untrustworthy conduct.
The just cause mentioned in this standard refers to the facts or reasons that meet one of the following conditions:
(1) The matter is forgiven by the victim of the relevant behavior;
(2) The reason is clearly convincing;
(3) The reason is in line with the universal value principles of human beings.
