ICE8000 Regional Credit Ranking and Supervision Standards

Chapter I General Provisions

1.1 In order to conduct objective and holistic credit evaluations for various countries and regions, help countries and regions to improve the credit system of their countries and regions in accordance with scientific methods, promote social integrity, reduce transaction costs, and enhance human well-being. The legal principles and international practices of the World Credit Organization [WCO] develop this standard.

1.2 The main legal basis for the development, application and implementation of this standard is as follows:

(1) The principle of freedom of the Constitution. The constitutions of the vast majority of countries in the world give people the freedom to defend their legitimate rights, the freedom to maintain social justice and the freedom to express their opinions.

(2) The principle of public order and goodness of law. This legal principle gives people the right to maintain social justice. The basic principles of civil law in most countries of the world include the principles of public order and good customs.

(3) The principle of good faith in law. This legal principle gives people the obligation of good faith. Most countries in the world regard the principle of good faith as the basic law of their civil and commercial laws.

(4) The principle of freedom of contract in law, also known as the principle of free agreement. This legal principle gives people the freedom to enter into a civil contract. The basic principles of civil law in most countries of the world include the principle of freedom of contract.

1.3 The conduct of the application and implementation of this standard shall be deemed to be the tripartite or multi-party contractual act of the World Credit Organization [WCO] in Delaware, USA, as an attestation or supervisor, and The relevant disputes arising from this act are applicable to and protected by the laws of the State of Delaware and the United States, and the jurisdiction is also the International Court of Ethics or the Delaware Court of the United States and the United States Federal Court. If the parties have agreed otherwise or otherwise stated in the applicable law and/or jurisdiction, the binding does not involve the World Credit Organization [WCO].

1.4 The term “region” as used in this standard refers to a country, or a region that is independently managed for some historical reason, or an administrative region that is relatively independently managed within a country.

The regional integrity referred to in this standard refers to the overall integrity of a region, which is composed of the integrity of the state organs, enterprises and other units and individuals in the region.

The cost of loss of trust referred to in this standard refers to the sum of material and spiritual costs before, during and after the unit or individual engaged in acts of dishonesty.

The ICE8000 credit information database referred to in this standard refers to the credit information database established and maintained by the World Credit Organization [WCO]. The information in the library is collected, organized, saved, disseminated, objected, and deleted according to the published ICE8000 international credit standard system standard. .

1.5 This standard applies to the integrity ranking of the region.

1.6 The integrity ranking of the region is mainly based on the following principles:

(1) Under normal circumstances, the more unresolved [untrusted behavior], [untrusted behavior], [disobedience], [violation of moral bottom line behavior], [violation of social responsibility bottom line behavior] in an area, the more the cost of loss of trust Low, the greater the likelihood that the above behavior will continue to occur, the lower the social integrity. However, objectively, it is not possible to directly assess the true number of such acts in a region. Therefore, the negative effective official credit evaluation information in the ICE8000 credit information database is used to indirectly evaluate the number of such behaviors in a region.

(2) Under normal circumstances, [integrity behavior], [good faith behavior], [support behavior], [observance of moral bottom line behavior], [moral noble behavior], [bearing social responsibility bottom line behavior], [positive] The more social responsibility behaviors undertaken, the higher the incentives for the behavior, the higher the social integrity of the region. However, objectively, it is not possible to directly assess the true number and incentives of the above-mentioned behaviors in a region. Therefore, using the praise information in the ICE8000 credit information database to indirectly evaluate the number and incentives of the above behaviors in an area.

(3) Under normal circumstances, the more units with a willingness to be honest in a region, the higher the integrity. However, it is objectively impossible to directly assess the number of units with a willingness to be honest in a region. Therefore, the number of ICE8000 established units in the region is used to indirectly evaluate the number of units with good faith in the region.

(4) Under normal circumstances, the more credit agencies with full-time anti-fraud in a region, the higher the integrity. However, it is objectively impossible to directly assess the number of full-time anti-fraud credit agencies in a region. Therefore, the number of ICE8000 credit institutions in the region is used to indirectly evaluate the number of full-time anti-fraud credit agencies in the region.

(5) Under normal circumstances, the longer a region has a willingness to be honest, the higher the integrity. However, objectively, it is impossible to directly assess the length of time a region has a willingness to be honest. Therefore, in terms of the length of time that the region maintains the membership of the World Credit Organization [WCO], it will indirectly evaluate the length of its willingness to be honest.

1.7 Regional integrity rankings follow the principles of openness, justice, fairness, transparency, supervision, public welfare, and the principle of combining dynamics and statics.

1.8 World Credit Organization [WCO] conducts regional integrity ranking work and may not charge ranking fees to the ranked regions.

As a social welfare credit rating, the region will be ranked regardless of whether the state agencies in the ranked region agree.

1.9 World Credit Organization [WCO] ranks according to ranking points in each region. For the regions with the same ranking points, make a side-by-side ranking.

1.10 In order to avoid the consequences of misleading the public caused by the limitation of ranking work, starting from 2009, regardless of the number of people to be ranked, starting from 101, no first, second or top 100; The ranking report should clearly indicate the limitations of the ranking work.

1.11 All parties applying this standard shall, in the process of applying this standard, abide by the principle of good faith, moral bottom line, and social responsibility bottom line, and exercise and assume the rights and obligations stipulated in this standard.

1.12 All parties to this standard are deemed to have fully understood and committed to comply with all the provisions of this standard. However, if any party to this standard finds any unfairness in any of the provisions of this standard, it has the right to publicly declare that it is not subject to public disclosure of the relevant circumstances and reasons and written notice to the World Credit Organization [WCO]. Terms and conditions.

Chapter II Ranking Calculation Standard

2.1 Regional ranking points calculation standards are:

(1) The following indicators indirectly reflect the number of unrepaired negative credit records in a region, which indirectly reflects the cost of untrustworthy units and individuals in the region.

The information on the internal stock file (stock refers to the existing information in the information database during the period of the ranking), the internal complaints, credit warning, public complaints, internal exposure, public exposure, joint exposure (credit wanted order) information, according to the article The deduction points and deduction points are deducted according to the influence credit scores in the ICE8000 Integrity Points Standard .

Reasons for deduction: See 1.6(1). In addition: these are untrustworthy behaviors that have not been effectively and promptly handled and corrected. The responsible persons of the breach of trust are still benefiting. The victims of the untrustworthy behavior still have not received material or spiritual reassurance. Those who are untrustworthy and responsible for the act of dishonesty Still eroding people's confidence in integrity itself.

(2) The following indicators indirectly reflect the number of positive credit records in an area and the level of incentives of honest people.

The stocks in the regional credit files are effective and praised, and the points are added according to the article. The added points are added according to the influence of the integrity scores in the ICE8000 Integrity Points Standard .

Reason for extra points: See 1.6(2). In addition: people are more willing to interact with honest people, praise the dissemination of information, will enable the credible to get more benefits or benefit opportunities, so that credible people are more willing to be honest, so that others are more willing to emulate the honest.

(3) The following indicators indirectly reflect the number of units with a willingness to be honest in a region.

According to the number of ICE8000 credited units in the regional credit file, the added value will be increased according to the influence of the integrity score in the ICE8000 Integrity Points Standard .

Reason for extra points: See 1.6(3).

(4) The following indicators indirectly reflect the number of full-time anti-fraud credit agencies in a region.

The points are added according to the number of ICE8000 credit institutions in the regional credit file, and the bonus points are increased according to the influence of the integrity scores in the ICE8000 Integrity Points Standard .

Reason for extra points: See 1.6(4).

(5) The following indicators indirectly reflect the length of time a region has a willingness to be in good faith, which indirectly reflects its integrity.

The bonus points are increased according to the time integrity score in the ICE8000 Integrity Points Standard .

Additional reasons: See ranking criteria 1.6 (5)

2.2 Ranking points are less than zero points are ranked objects, can be included in the black list; ranked points with more than zero points can be listed in the red list. Organizations with a ranking integral equal to zero may not be included in the ranked object.

Chapter III Ranking Work Procedures

3.1 Dynamic ranking work program: The background computer system dynamically updates the ranking points and ranking order in real time according to the relevant data in the background. If the relevant party disagrees with the relevant data, it shall promptly submit it.

3.2 If dynamic ranking is not possible, or if there is dynamic ranking but there is still a need for static ranking, the working procedure is as follows:

(1) According to the ranking data or the dynamic ranking data at a certain point in time, write a ranking report, and publicize the ranking report. The publicity period is generally no less than 7 days, and the public can raise objections and evidence on the publicity situation.

(2) Verification. Verification of the objection received during the publicity period, adjustment of rankings according to the verification situation, and writing of the verification to the ranking report.

(3) Announce the ranking results.

Chapter IV Liability for breach of contract and method of investigation

4.1 If the party violates the provisions of this standard, it shall bear the following liability for breach of contract:

(1) The corresponding legal liability, namely: the legal punishment prescribed by the relevant applicable law.

(2) Corresponding credit responsibility, that is, to bear credit punishments such as internal complaints, public complaints, credit warnings, internal exposure, public exposure, joint exposure, etc.

(3) The corresponding industry self-discipline responsibility, namely: announcement of criticism, fines, cancellation of credit card, prohibition of self-discipline and other disciplines.

(4) If the breach of contract causes losses (including material damage and mental damage) to others, it shall be liable for compensation. If the breach of contract constitutes a malicious dishonesty, it shall also make punitive damages to the infringed person in accordance with international practice and the principle of common law.

4.2 Method of investigation of breach of contract liability:

(1) According to the "ICS8000 International Credit Standard System Internal Complaint Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Public Complaint Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Credit Warning Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Internal Exposure Standard" or "ICE8000" International Exposure Standards for Public Credit Standards or Joint Exposure Standards for ICE8000 International Credit Standards System for credit complaints and credit penalties;

(2) Applying for arbitration under the International Credit Dispute Arbitration Commission in accordance with the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System International Credit Dispute Arbitration Standard, without the need to submit a separate arbitration agreement;

(3) Apply to the International Moral Court for trial in accordance with the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System International Credit Dispute Trial Standard;

(4) If the defaulter has the membership of the World Credit Organization [WCO], the parties also have the right to make a complaint in accordance with the World Credit Organization [WCO] Member Supervision Standards;

(5) File a lawsuit in the US Delaware Court or the US Federal Court in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware or the United States federal law.

4.3 The responsibility for breach of contract in this standard shall be based on the principle of ignoring:

(1) Only the aggrieved party will take the initiative to pursue the investigation, and the defaulting party will bear the corresponding liability for breach of contract;

(2) The aggrieved party has the right to decide whether to initiate the corresponding accountability procedure for breach of contract;

(3) The aggrieved party has the right to understand the defaulting party or reach an agreement with the defaulting party.

4.4 For employees or agents who participate in, execute, or assist the parties to breach the contract, the aggrieved party has the right to pursue its corresponding responsibility unless it proves that it is not at fault.

4.5 Violations of the provisions of this standard may and should be considered as an independent breach of contract or dishonesty. If the relevant parties appear in the process of applying this standard, such acts as fraudulent, covert, defamatory, insulting, and denying others' credit evaluation rights, the act is an independent malicious dishonesty act or an independent serious malicious dishonesty. The parties concerned have the right to merge. Investigate or separately pursue the responsibility of the independent dishonesty.

4.6 The World Credit Organization [WCO] shall bear economic compensation for its own faults, and the expenditure for economic compensation shall be included in the financial plan of the World Credit Organization [WCO] for the next year. If the economic compensation is relatively large, compensation shall be made in each year.

After accepting economic compensation, the World Credit Organization [WCO] has the right to recover losses from units or individuals responsible for acts of dishonesty with gross negligence or subjective intent.

Chapter V Supplementary Provisions

5.1 This standard shall be implemented as of the date of promulgation.

5.2 The terminology involved in this standard, if its meaning is not agreed in this standard, its meaning is described in the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Industry Terminology.

5.3 All relevant parties submit various types of materials submitted to the World Credit Organization [WCO] (or ICE8000 Credit Agency) in accordance with this standard. For the copyright agreement, see the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Document Copyright Management Standard.

5.4 If the relevant parties know or ought to have known that any of the terms or conditions of this standard have not been complied with, but still do not expressly file a written objection in time for this non-compliance, it is deemed to waive their right to file an objection. The waiving party shall bear the legal consequences such as losses caused by the waiver, and the World Credit Organization [WCO] and other parties shall not be responsible for this.

5.5 This standard will be revised and improved. All parties applying this standard should pay full attention to the revision of this standard and apply the latest version of this standard, but the behavior that occurred before the revision of this standard may not be subject to the new revised clause. The official website of the latest Chinese version of this standard is: https://www.ice8000.org/aenhw/gc/37.html .

5.6 The copyright of this standard belongs to the World Credit Organization [WCO], members can use it for free and unlimited use; non-members can use it free of charge for study, training, research, self-use, reprint, citation, adaptation, reference, reference under the premise of indicating or declaring the source. , reference. No unit or individual may plagiarize plagiarism or disguise plagiarism or otherwise infringe. Otherwise, we will jointly expose the infringing units, individuals and related personnel after the investigation of the infringement facts is clear (to issue a credit wanted order to the society). And reserves the right to pursue their legal responsibility. Do not infringe or infringe.

5.7 The standard version number is expressed as: ICE8000-abcd, where: the front-end ICE8000 indicates that this standard is one of the standards of the ICE8000 international credit standard system; a is the serial number of the standard in the ICE8000 system standard, if this standard is Abolished, the serial number is sometimes transferred to other standards; b is the initial writing time of this standard; c is the latest revision time of this standard; d is the number of revisions of this standard.

5.8 This standard is interpreted by the World Credit Organization [WCO].