Violation of the Bottom Line of Moral Conscience and Responsibility Identification-World Credit Organization

3.4 Violation of the bottom line of moral conscience and identification of responsibility attribution

Violation of the bottom line of moral conscience and the identification of responsibility attribution is a right and wrong identification standard and service designed by the World Credit Organization [WCO]. www.ice8000.org/acnhwgc/111.htm).

People can use this credit service to identify right from wrong. This service can be an independent service, and at the same time, it is generally included in the practice procedures such as internal complaints and credit warnings. Therefore, it is generally not recommended for customers to use the service alone.

3.4.1 The standard of moral conscience bottom line content

1. Human moral conscience is the subjective pursuit and maintenance of [human universal values]. In different times and spaces, in addition to the correct judgment of moral right and wrong, [moral] is sometimes mistaken for [immoral], and [immoral] is sometimes mistaken for [moral]. People should not use [the success or failure of the actor] as the standard of moral right and wrong, nor should they use [the law or state power or customs or the number of people] as the standard of moral right and wrong, but should use [whether the actor violates the universal value of human beings] as a standard of moral right and wrong.

Second, no matter how perfect the law and system are, they are only infinitely close to perfection, but they will never reach perfection. Objectively speaking, there will always be flaws in laws and systems. [Human moral conscience] will make up for the flaws of laws and systems, and enhance the well-being of mankind.

Third, the rights holders have the right to voluntarily waive or transfer their legitimate rights and interests in the form of [express or default] contract. If the rights holder has not voluntarily given up his legitimate rights and interests, nor has he transferred his legitimate rights and interests in the form of a contract, then others should not steal, occupy, erode or covet the rights holder's legitimate rights and interests for any reason, otherwise, it is a [damage or potential damage legitimate rights and interests of others]. People can call [damage or potential damage to the legitimate rights and interests of others] as [evil].

Fourth, the bottom line of human moral conscience, in short, is [do no evil], the specific standards are as follows:

(1) Subjectively and intentionally [damaging or potentially damaging the legitimate rights and interests of others], if you know that you have objectively [damaged or potentially damaging the legitimate rights and interests of others], sincerely correct and/or apologize. (In short: do not intentionally hurt others, and sincerely correct and/or apologize if you did wrongly.)

(2) Subjectively, one does not seek or maintain [the rights and interests of another person or a group of people or oneself] at the cost of damaging or potentially damaging [the legitimate rights and interests of another person or a group of people]. (Note: The mayor assigning the police to risk their lives to stop a violent crime does not constitute damage to the legitimate rights and interests of the police [the legitimate rights and interests here refer to: the right to life and health], because a person who chooses the profession of the police is equivalent to using a contract The form transfers part of the legitimate rights and interests of oneself [the legitimate rights and interests here refer to: the right to life and health when performing duties]. Another example: the bank president orders the staff to wear work clothes during work, which does not belong to the damage to the legitimate rights and interests of the employees [here The legitimate rights and interests refer to: the right to dress freely], because a person chooses the profession of a bank employee, which is equivalent to transferring part of his own legitimate rights and interests in the form of a contract [here the legitimate rights and interests refer to: the right to freely decide what to wear during work] ].)

(3) In the event of a conflict [such as: war, civil disputes, etc.], the parties to the conflict subjectively avoid damage or potential damage [innocent and third parties] to the greatest extent subjectively, and objectively cause damage or Compensation for potential damages. (Note: Various conflicts are objectively inevitable sometimes, but regardless of whether the conflict itself violates the moral bottom line, the parties to the conflict should not damage or potentially damage the legitimate rights and interests of [innocent and third parties].)

An act that conforms to the content described in the first paragraph is a [behavior in line with the bottom line of moral conscience].

If a person or unit or region decides to act in accordance with the first paragraph, it can be regarded as a moral person or unit or region.

5. Behaviors that violate the bottom line of moral conscience are unethical behaviors, including but not limited to the following behaviors:

(1) Subjectively, the perpetrator has the purpose of [harming or potentially harming the legitimate rights and interests of others], and has taken corresponding actions, regardless of whether he benefits objectively.

(2) Subjectively, the actor seeks or maintains [the rights and interests of another person or a group of people or himself] at the cost of damaging or potentially damaging [the legitimate rights and interests of another person or a group of people], regardless of whether the purpose is achieved .

(3) Subjectively, although the perpetrator has no malicious purpose or even has a good intention, the improper method objectively damages or potentially damages the legitimate rights and interests of others, and he still refuses to do so after knowing or should have known. corrections and/or sincere apologies.

(4) The perpetrator deliberately takes advantage of [legal flaws, system flaws, bad customs and habits] to damage or potentially damage the legitimate rights and interests of others.

The person or unit or region who committed the above-mentioned unethical behavior belongs to [unethical person or unit or region] until he sincerely corrects or apologizes.

6. Thoughts or motives that violate the bottom line of morality are immoral thoughts or motives.

A person or unit with immoral thoughts or motives, until it is corrected, belongs to [immoral person or unit or region]. Although it does not need to bear responsibility due to its non-related actions, all relevant parties still need to be cautious in dealing with it.

7. Any of the following situations does not belong to the scope of moral evaluation and appraisal:

(1) Behavior, thoughts or motives in the sphere of personal private life;

(2) None of the acts, thoughts, or motives of the injured person or potential injured person.

3.4.2 The attribution of responsibility, omitted, is basically the same as the attribution of responsibility for dishonesty.

The above content is excerpted from "Introduction to ICE8000 Credit Knowledge" (written by Fang Bangjian, free to use, but please indicate the source)